Judgment[1986] KEHC 51
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1414 OF 1980 JUMA KHAMISI KARIUKI ….…..………………………………..….………PLAINTIFF versus EAST AFRICA INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND GEORGE OKOKO ….….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 608 OF 1985 and 265 OF1986 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER MAINA NDIRANGU.........................................APPELLANTS VERSUS REPUBLIC........................................................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 3452 OF 1984 JOSEPH MUTUNGA WAMBUA............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KANTILAL KHIMJI PATEL & ANOTHER..........................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
The application which is expressed to be brought under order 94 rule 10 and 11, order XXI rule 22, order XII rule 1 and order XXII rule 11(1) and (2) Civil Procedure Rules was filed on 27th, two days before the date fixed for the sale of goods attached in the suit to recover the amount of the decree. The goods include, an air compressor, two sand blasting units, three air spray guns, three tool kits and some spare parts.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO'S 1290, 1291, 1292 & 1293 OF1985 (CONSOLIDATED) 1. PETER WAFULA SIMIYU ALIAS BOSCO WAGOYE..................APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC.........................................................................................RESPONDENTS
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO,S1288 & 1239 of 1984 1.L.L 2.P.M.........................................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS 1.JARED.A.AYUKU 2.KIPLANGAT ARAP CHEPKUL........................DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1252 OF 1985 MBUTHIA........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION.................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO 1624 OF 1979 MARTINE APIYO WAINDI …………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING CO LTD & ANOTHER …....……DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Case
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2260 OF 1982 NEWSTANLEY HOTEL LIMITED ...................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ARCADE TOBACCONISTS LIMITED..........................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCase number Civil Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 648 OF 1985 NATGIL ENTERPRISES LIMITED........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS GATUKUYU COFEE GROWERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD & 2 OTHERS..............................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 772 OF 1984 AURORA BAKING COMPANY (1975) LTD………………PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AND PHENNTHA WANINGI AND 3 OTHERS………….DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS RULING By an order of this court dated 19.11.84 the hearing of the plaintiff’s/applicant’s application filed in this court on 13.11.84 was stood over to 8.1.85 before the Duty Judge and the caveat lodged in respect of L R No.10445/3 situated in Nyandarua District was extended pending the disposa
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1419 OF 1984 GORDHANDAS DHARAMSHI & BROTHERS LIMITED................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC............................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Second Class District Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi, Miss B L Obayo)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 297 OF 1984 AMOS MBURU GATHAGU..........................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Thika, RN Kamiro Esq)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
advocates for all the parties had agreed on the quotum of damages and hence the following consent order was recorded by this court. “By consent judgment for the plaintiff against all the defendants jointly and severally in the inclusive sum of shs 2,153,500 inclusive of costs with court disbursements to be paid by the defendants.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 751 OF 1977 1. BEATRICE MUSANGI...........................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS MARGARET NZAMBI...............................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 35 OF 1983 REPUBLIC.......................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS HASMUKH MEGHJI SHAH.......................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 357 OF 1983 OKELLO ODERO..................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..........................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court, at Machakos)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 1983 JAMES ODEMBA OTIENO...............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.......................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from Conviction and Sentence of the Court Martial at 7th Kenya Rifles Langata Barracks, Nairobi)