Mutemi v Republic
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…That failure amounted to non-compliance with the mandatory provision in S. 344A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.…
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
…Mr Chunga contended that no provisions of the Constitution had been violated although there were complaints about non-compliance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code.…
…According to him non-compliance with certain provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, if any, were procedural irregularities and not constitutional issues.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…That failure amounted to non-compliance with the mandatory provision in S. 344A(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandCivil Suit
…On the consequences of non compliance with the filing of the verifying affidavit totally or filing a defective one, the Court of Appeal had this to say, at the same page 1 of the judgment line 3 from the bottom, “Having come…
…effect of rules of procedure in so far as they go to affect either substantive justice or technical justice as well as Civil Appeals construction of order vii rule 1(2) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Rules on the effect of non…
Division and case type: CriminalCase number Criminal Revision
…FINE FOR NON-COMPLIANCE TO DATE OR ORDER, AND ORDER COSTS (3) The court may by such order impose a fine not exceeding two hundred shillings on the person on whom the order is made, and may also give directions as to the payment…
…FINE FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITHIN TIME SET BY NOTICE, AND ORDER COSTS (4) If the court is satisfied that the nuisance, although removed since the service of the notice, was not removed within the time specified in such notice…
Division and case type: Commercial and TaxInsolvency Cause
…He has disputed the amount before us and he relies on a statement of affairs which we hold to be inadmissible in evidence for non-compliance with rule 149(2).…