Search court decisions

…Mr Pandya contends that even if damages were to be awarded, this factor had to be taken into account and this latter contention must be the basis of ground 2 in the memorandum of appeal which complains that the Shs 100,000…

…Were the damages awarded excessive as claimed in ground two of the memorandum of appeal?…

…Nevertheless, having considered Mr Juma’s argument, and particularly grounds 5 an 6 of the proposed memorandum of appeal which state: “It was wrong in principle to have set aside the dismissal when a fresh action was already…

…these awards in the High Court at Mombasa on April 30, 1984: Kshs Net special damages 13,150 Loss of future earnings 63,000 General damages 250,000 Total 326,150 The appellant has come to this court because (in the words of…

…his memorandum of appeal of June 5, 1984. 1) The learned judge erred in awarding Kshs 250,000 by way of general damages for pain and suffering and loss of the amenities of life for the injuries he sustained. 2) The learned…

…these awards in the High Court at Mombasa on April 30, 1984: Kshs Net special damages 13,150 Loss of future earnings 63,000 General damages 250,000 Total 326,150 The appellant has come to this court because (in the words of…

…his memorandum of appeal of June 5, 1984. 1) The learned judge erred in awarding Kshs 250,000 by way of general damages for pain and suffering and loss of the amenities of life for the injuries he sustained. 2) The learned…

…RESPODENT (Appeal from the adjournment order on cost and ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Aragon J) dated February 14, 1986 In Civil Case NO 867 (O S of 1985) __________________ JUDGMENT OF PLATT, AG J A In the memorandum…

…of appeal it is protested that several steps in the proceedings were undertaken so unreasonably, that there was a failure of justice.…

…Mr Aboo’s client was aggrieved by this so Mr Aboo filed its memorandum of appeal on May 23, 1984 with these four grounds: (a) That the learned judge erred in law in holding that the plaintiff’s right of action had not expired…

…It would appear from the memorandum of appeal overall, that the appellant contends that the learned judge approached the problem in the wrong way.…