Search court decisions

…In an application for review under Order 44, rule 1, which this one is, the applicant must demonstrate the discovery of a new and important matter or evidence which, after exercise of due diligence, was not within his knowledge…

…It would appear from the process server’s report that service was done in accordance with Order V rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules which states:- “Where the serving officer, after using all due diligence cannot find the…

…Court of Kenya held following the decision in Uganda case of Erukana Kavuma v Mehta, [1960] EA 305, that before a process server can validly effect service by affixing a copy of the summons to the premises must use “all due…

…It would appear from the process server’s report that service was done in accordance with Order V rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules which states:- “Where the serving officer, after using all due diligence cannot find the…

…Court of Kenya held following the decision in Uganda case of Erukana Kavuma v Mehta, [1960] EA 305, that before a process server can validly effect service by affixing a copy of the summons to the premises must use “all due…

…Secondly that the decree issued herein on 26th March, 1993 be reviewed on grounds inter alia:- "a.There has been discovery of new and important matters which after exercise of due diligence was not within the plaintiff's…

…That the applicants have not satisfied the ingredients for review as there is no allegation that there is discovery of new and important matter which they could not discover earlier on with due diligence when the consent…