Search court decisions

…The Supreme Court thus allowed the application.…

…Rule 24 of the Supreme Court Rules deals with applications for grant of certication. Rule 26 deals with urgent applications.…

…According to him, the Plaintiff’s application was aimed at defeating their claim which they had acquired by operation of law. When the application came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Applicant Mr.…

…This is not an application for a mandatory injunction, it is one brought under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.…

…further that the application ought to have been brought under order 49 of the Civil Procedure Rules and not Section 79 G of the Civil Procedure Act.…

…I have carefully considered this application and the submissions of both counsels.…

….……....RESPONDENT RULING The Memorandum of appeal was filed on 21st October, 2009 simultaneously with application for stay of execution.…

…On 9th March, 2011, the respondent in the appeal brought the present application for orders that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution for the reason that ten months (at the time of filing of this application) had…

…Application granted. Order: Further to the court’s order of 5.7.93, the owner of land 986 Eliud N. Gituto or his agent/servant be herein present in order to ascertain the boundary. Eliud N.…

…The application came for hearing before Khamoni, J on the 10th April, 1990, and in a reserved ruling delivered on the 17th April, 1990, the learned judge dismissed the application with costs.…

…the application was incompetent.…

…Before the mention date, application to set aside the arbitration award was filed on April 2, 1984.…

…Both applications were listed for hearing on the same day the April 10, 1985.…

…That this application be heard inter-partes on 29.8.95. 4. That the costs of this application do abide the outcome of the application.…

…The application is opposed by the defendants who have filed their own application to strike out the Applicant’s application. They gave notice of legal objections.…

…It is apparent from the letter of consent that the application having been made on May 11, 1980, consent was not granted within three months.…

…If the application had failed by August then a new application could be made in September and that had not been granted in time. Unfortunately that is not the case.…

…It would perhaps have been more appropriate if an application had been made under section 9 or 12 of the Arbitration Act, to replace an arbitrator who had refused to act.…

…Next, the learned judge refused Mr Ghadialy’s fourth application for leave to withdraw from the suit. Kuloba J then proceeded to hear the evidence of the respondent.…

…So it would have been unfair and unjust to allow the application after such a long period. Nduhiu’s appeal was instituted on September 13, 1985.…

…Even the application to set it aside had not been made for four years. Order IXB rule 8 on August 2, 1979, which is the date when the application to set aside the judgment was filed, was this – “8.…

…On the defendant’s application the court ordered the plaintiff on June 7, 1982 to supply the particulars asked for in the prescribed form No 15, Appendix B of the Civil Procedure Rules, within seventy days.…

…The court made the order asked for and the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed even though the particulars had been supplied before the hearing date of the defendant’s application, and notwithstanding also the plaintiff’s offer…

…Let it also be borne in mind, what the limits of the application were. Section 28(1) of the Act (cap 22) permits an ex parte application to be made.…

…Sec. 28(2) provides: “(2) Where such an application is made before the commencement of a relevant action, the court shall grant leave in respect of any cause of action to which the application relates; if, but only if, on…

…So the judgment entered in terms of the award was that Gathigia’s application by originating summons was dismissed with costs.…

…He learned judge agreed with Mr Ole Kaparo and dismissed the application with costs.…

…No such application was made although the matter was fixed for mention on 9th August, 1983, some two months after the reading of the award.…

…He did not object and could not have done so successfully because no application had been made within the time allowed by Rule 16. There is no substance in the second ground of appeal.…

…NO. 15 OF 1995) *********************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is a second appeal on an interlocutory application.…

…The Plaintiff’s Advocate opposed the application for adjournment and the Court agreed with her that because the Defendant’s Advocate had had ample opportunity to withdraw, he had not done so and was not entitled to an adjournment…

…He did not however have a copy of the sale agreement, application form for the land control board consent or even the transfer. With that 1st defendant closed his case.…

…He did not also tender in evidence the application form for the land control board or even the transfer form from Nderi Gatimu to himself.…

…AFC maintained that the plaintiff, that is, the appellant, was its “loanee”, that the appellant was in default and that the AFC was fully justified in seizing the pick-up, and (in the Notice of Objection to the injunction application…