Search court decisions

…IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KWACH, AKIWUMI & SHAH JJ A CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 251 OF 1994 BETWEEN ARTHUR K.…

…The application is supported by the affidavit of Mr Magugu sworn on 7th December, 1994.…

…There are before the Court two applications Nos 143 of 1987 and No 6 of 1988. In the first, the applicant Lydia Wanjiru Mwangi seeks an extension of time to lodge the record of appeal out of time.…

…In accordance with our usual practice both applications were heard together, the application for leave to extend time being heard first. The Ruling of the High Court was given on July 3, 1987.…

…According to him, the Plaintiff’s application was aimed at defeating their claim which they had acquired by operation of law. When the application came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Applicant Mr.…

…This is not an application for a mandatory injunction, it is one brought under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.…

…The suit in the Court of the Resident Magistrate was instituted by two people namely Hassan Saidi Dele and Major Henry Mwalugha who are the respondents to this application. They oppose the application for transfer.…

…I think the applicant was wrong to bring this application to Court by way of a summons in chambers.…

…IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GICHERU, OMOLO & OWUOR, JJ.A) CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 59 OF 1996 BETWEEN E.A. BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED ....................................APPELLANT AND A.C.A.…

…Building Society Limited, who has now made this application before us. We shall hereinafter refer to E.A. Building Society Limited as the applicant and D'Souza and Khandwalla as the respondents.…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.…

…NAI. 4 OF 1999 BETWEEN GHARIB MOHAMED GHARIB.............................APPLICANT AND SULEKHA MOHAMED NAAMAN.............................RESPONDENT (An application to file appeal out of time in an intended appeal from a…

…The application came for hearing before Khamoni, J on the 10th April, 1990, and in a reserved ruling delivered on the 17th April, 1990, the learned judge dismissed the application with costs.…

…the application was incompetent.…

…Nassir is of the contrary view and urges the court to dismiss the application more so as no security has been provided in terms of order 41 rule 4 (2) (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.…

…Nassir is of the contrary view and urges the court to dismiss the application more so as no security has been provided in terms of order 41 rule 4 (2) (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.…

…Upon application he was allowed to submit in opposition of the application on the basis of the pleadings and the law only. In support of the application the plaintiff swore one affidavit.…

…This application was then rendered necessary.…

…Although Mr Mburu Kariuki opposes this application on the grounds that the application is misconceived and bad in law; that the application has been overtaken by events as attachment of the defendant’s property has been effected…

…and that there are no chances of the appeal succeeding, I think most of those matters are not relevant factors for consideration in this application.…

…that the application is incompetent .…

…The application comeslate because in execution of that same order of mandamus the 17.…

…DEBTOR RULING This is an application by the objector to the attachment of motor vehicle KXK 245 in execution of the decree in this suit. The application is brought under order XXI r 56 of the Civil Procedure Code.…

…This is an application by Messrs A Y A Jiwaji & Jiwaji who are now acting for the defendant for dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution.…

…That application was listed for hearing on April 14, 1983.…

…The Application is supported by the affidavit of the second defendant.…

…We have not been told why they did not oppose the application. The defence was struck out on the 23rd November 2000. This application was not brought until the 3rd August 2005 after execution had issued.…

…The first one is that the learned Principal magistrate erred in proceeding to hear the two applications in the face of the stay order in HC Misc. Civil Application Number 261 of 2006.…

…The second issue that the Appellant was not given sufficient notice for the hearing of the applications has equally no merit. The applications had been served much earlier.…

…Twelve months elapsed before an application was brought. An application was brought after the suit had abated. The application was not argued.…

…Had the parties not entered into a consent order with regard to the orders which were sought in that application the court would have considered the application on the merits.…

…The application is supported by the affidavit of one Yasmin Abdulkarim Ali, who was the then advocate for the plaintiff when the application was filed.…

…Mr Congo argued the application before me. No other affidavit apart from that sworn by Mrs Ali was filed on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant, Container Freight Co Ltd, opposes the application.…

….……....RESPONDENT RULING The Memorandum of appeal was filed on 21st October, 2009 simultaneously with application for stay of execution.…

…On 9th March, 2011, the respondent in the appeal brought the present application for orders that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution for the reason that ten months (at the time of filing of this application) had…