Search court decisions

…There are before the Court two applications Nos 143 of 1987 and No 6 of 1988. In the first, the applicant Lydia Wanjiru Mwangi seeks an extension of time to lodge the record of appeal out of time.…

…In accordance with our usual practice both applications were heard together, the application for leave to extend time being heard first. The Ruling of the High Court was given on July 3, 1987.…

…The suit in the Court of the Resident Magistrate was instituted by two people namely Hassan Saidi Dele and Major Henry Mwalugha who are the respondents to this application. They oppose the application for transfer.…

…I think the applicant was wrong to bring this application to Court by way of a summons in chambers.…

…IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GICHERU, OMOLO & OWUOR, JJ.A) CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 59 OF 1996 BETWEEN E.A. BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED ....................................APPELLANT AND A.C.A.…

…Building Society Limited, who has now made this application before us. We shall hereinafter refer to E.A. Building Society Limited as the applicant and D'Souza and Khandwalla as the respondents.…

…REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.…

…NAI. 4 OF 1999 BETWEEN GHARIB MOHAMED GHARIB.............................APPLICANT AND SULEKHA MOHAMED NAAMAN.............................RESPONDENT (An application to file appeal out of time in an intended appeal from a…

…Nassir is of the contrary view and urges the court to dismiss the application more so as no security has been provided in terms of order 41 rule 4 (2) (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.…

…Nassir is of the contrary view and urges the court to dismiss the application more so as no security has been provided in terms of order 41 rule 4 (2) (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.…

…Upon application he was allowed to submit in opposition of the application on the basis of the pleadings and the law only. In support of the application the plaintiff swore one affidavit.…

…This application was then rendered necessary.…

…Although Mr Mburu Kariuki opposes this application on the grounds that the application is misconceived and bad in law; that the application has been overtaken by events as attachment of the defendant’s property has been effected…

…and that there are no chances of the appeal succeeding, I think most of those matters are not relevant factors for consideration in this application.…

…that the application is incompetent .…

…The application comeslate because in execution of that same order of mandamus the 17.…

…DEBTOR RULING This is an application by the objector to the attachment of motor vehicle KXK 245 in execution of the decree in this suit. The application is brought under order XXI r 56 of the Civil Procedure Code.…

…This is an application by Messrs A Y A Jiwaji & Jiwaji who are now acting for the defendant for dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution.…

…That application was listed for hearing on April 14, 1983.…

…The Application is supported by the affidavit of the second defendant.…

…We have not been told why they did not oppose the application. The defence was struck out on the 23rd November 2000. This application was not brought until the 3rd August 2005 after execution had issued.…

…The first one is that the learned Principal magistrate erred in proceeding to hear the two applications in the face of the stay order in HC Misc. Civil Application Number 261 of 2006.…

…The second issue that the Appellant was not given sufficient notice for the hearing of the applications has equally no merit. The applications had been served much earlier.…

…Twelve months elapsed before an application was brought. An application was brought after the suit had abated. The application was not argued.…

…Had the parties not entered into a consent order with regard to the orders which were sought in that application the court would have considered the application on the merits.…

…The application is supported by the affidavit of one Yasmin Abdulkarim Ali, who was the then advocate for the plaintiff when the application was filed.…

…Mr Congo argued the application before me. No other affidavit apart from that sworn by Mrs Ali was filed on behalf of the plaintiff. The defendant, Container Freight Co Ltd, opposes the application.…

…The defendants brought ann application seeking security for costs under Order XXV rule 1 and section 401 of the Companies Act.…

…The application is brought under order XXV r1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and s 401 of the Companies. Nothing specifically turns on the rules under which the application has been filed.…

….…….3RD DEFENDANT RULING AND/OR DIRECTIONS A fundamental issue has arisen in respect of the application dated 30.10.2010 by the 1st Defendant and which all parties agree will have crucial consequences or ramifications depending…

…In particular the court will have to be told the possible effect of this on the 3 pending applications and the entire suit. Dated at Mombasa this 16th day of December 2010. M.K. IBRAHIM J U D G E…

…“If no affidavit and no statement under sub rule 1 is filed an order may be made on the application ex parte.” I accordingly gave summary judgment to the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.…

…Unless the directors of the objector, who had been parties to the application which culminated in that ruling, succeeded on appeal and had that ruling set aside I am bound to find and hold that objection against the attachment…

….… RESPONDENT RULING This is an application by the defendant in the suit that the ex-parte judgment entered against him on 25/2/88 be set aside on the grounds that he was never served with summons to enter appearance and…

…I allow the application, set aside the ex-parte judgment entered on 25/2/ 88 and the execution thereon.…