Judgment[1999] KECA 96
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 1999 BETWEEN GHARIB MOHAMED GHARIB.............................APPLICANT AND SULEKHA MOHAMED NAAMAN.............................RESPONDENT (An application to file appeal out of time in an intended appeal from a ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa at (Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
decision of a single Judge (Shah, J.A.). On the 31st January, 1998, the learned single Judge made an order which, inter alia, awarded VAT at 15% to the bill of costs which had been taxed by a Deputy Registrar of the court at Mombasa at the total sum of Shs.15,635/=.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Appeal 119 of 1996 BAMBURI PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED……................................... PHILEMON OYIGO……………………....................................……………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, OMOLO & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 1995 BETWEEN BAMBURI PORTLAND CEMENT CO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, OMOLO & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 1995 BETWEEN BAMBURI PORTLAND CEMENT CO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, KWACH & OMOLO JJ A ) CIVIL APPEAL NO 159 OF 1994 BETWEEN CAR & GENERAL (K) LIMITED ...........................APPELLANT AND DIAMOND TRUST OF KENYA LIMITED ..............RESPONDENT (Appeal from the ruling and subsequent decree of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Justice Wambilyangah) dated 23rd March, 1994 in HCCC No 17 of 1993) *********************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT We think this appeal is clearly devoid of any merit. The appella
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KWACH, AKIWUMI & SHAH JJ A CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 251 OF 1994 BETWEEN ARTHUR K. MAGUGU .................................APPLICANT INN OF INNS LTD.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA ( Coram: Gachuhi, Muli & Tunoi JJ A ) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 1993 BETWEEN VICTORIA DE MEO..............................................................APPELLANT AND 1.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: NYARANGI, GACHUHI & MASIME JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 59 OF 1986 JIWA……………………………..……….. APPELLANT VERSUS JIWA & ANOTHER………...………… RESPONDENTS (Appeal from the Ruling/Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Rauf J) dated 15th July, 1985 in Civil Case No 851 of 1985)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
That evidence so far as it was adduced by the respondent fell foul of the requirements of rule 5 of Order 75: it failed to establish that the appellant was “the relevant “person”. The upshot of that is that the High Court did not have admiralty jurisdiction and the respondent was not entitled to invoke that jurisdiction.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Gachuhi, Nyarangi & Gicheru JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 16 OF 1989 MAKALA MAILU MUMENDE ........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NYALI GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB....................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Platt, Gachuhi JJA & Masime Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 91 OF 1987 Between NANDWA....................................................................PLAINTIFF AND KENYA KAZI LTD.................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bosire J)
Division and case type: CivilCase number Civil Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Platt, Gachuhi JJA &Masime Ag JA) CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 143 OF 1987 BETWEEN LYDIA WANJIRU MWANGI........................................APPELLANT AND RAJNIKANT JOSHI...............................................RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to file an appeal from a Ruling of the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) RULING January 28, 1988, Platt, Gachuhi JJA & Masime Ag JA delivered the following Ruling. There are before the Court tw
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: PLATT, APALOO JJA & MASIME Ag JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 67 OF 1985 SECURICOR (KENYA) LIMITED…….......…………………….APPLICANT VERSUS EA DRAPERS LIMITED …………………….……….....1ST DEFENDANT COMBINED WAREHOUSES LIMITED…..……….…..1ST DEFENDANT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J) RULING The applicant Securicor (K) Limited, gave notice on October 21 1986 that it would move the court for an order that leave be granted to the applicant, to amend the applicant’s
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA CORAM: MILLER CJ, NYARANGI & PLATT JJ A CIVIL APPEAL NO. 92 OF 1986 ALOYCE MARIERA ………………………........… APPELLANT VERSUS KENYA BUS SERVICES (MSA) LTD…………..….DEFENDANT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi and Platt, JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 49 OF 1984 BETWEEN ABDALLA HUSSEIN KILO………………………………….……….. APPELLANT AND KOMBO KASSIM OMAR IDA-SA-GODANA RANCHING CO-OP SOCIETY…....……….…RESPONDENTS (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Bhandari, J) dated October 13, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 26 of 1983) ________________ JUDGMENT OF HANCOX, J A I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgment of Platt,
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
and Mr Jayantilal Shah of that firm took over his defence. He applied on October 11, 1982 for an order that his firm should cease to act for the defendant because it could get no further instructions in the suit from the defendant which the defendant said he had not alternative but to accept and it was all right if the firm did not wish to represent him.