Judgment[1988] KEHC 49
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
….…...RESPONDENT RULING The Notice of Motion application which came for hearing was filed in court on 23rd March 1988. Exparte orders had been granted to the applicant on 7/3/88.…
…It was the inter-parte hearing which came before me.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The motion was fixed for hearing on 17th November, 1993, but on account of some confusion of the hearing date on the part of the Corporation’s advocates the hearing could not proceed on that date.…
…The motion was then fixed for hearing for 1st December 1993.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The usual rule is that an injunction is granted to preserve the subject-matter pending the hearing and the determination of the action so that the rights if any of an appellant are safeguarded to prevent the appeal, if successful…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…However, an issue that arose during the hearing of the appeal and which has been considered at some length in the judgments of my Lords Shah and Bosire, is whether the learned judge of the superior court was right when, upon…
…The suit came for a hearing on 8th May, 1995 before Ringera, J. The appellant was the only witness who testified in support of the plaintiff's case.…