Search court decisions

…The inordinate delay in the filing of the application for review. 3. Absence of any sufficient grounds.…

…With regard to the question of the locus standi and the inordinate delay it was apparent that Mr Gaturu during his eloquent submissions on these two issues had completely overlooked the fact that on 31st July, 1984, Mr Mutungi…

…Clearly there was no inordinate delay on the part of the applicant in making its present application.…

…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…

…In the circumstances of this case, that cannot be said to be inordinate delay as there is a good reason for not complying with procedural timelines.…

…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…

…In the circumstances of this case, that cannot be said to be inordinate delay as there is a good reason for not complying with procedural timelines.…

…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…

…In the circumstances of this case, that cannot be said to be inordinate delay as there is a good reason for not complying with procedural timelines.…

…There is also quite inordinate delay from August 8, 2001 when the record of appeal was purportedly served and the time this application was brought to Court on October 31, 2001.…

…Basically, the respondent argues that the application is fatally defective for inordinate delay and no sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant to justify grant of the reliefs applied for in the motion.…

…In the circumstances of this case, that cannot be said to be inordinate delay as there is a good reason for not complying with procedural timelines.…

…There has therefore been no inordinate delay as the total period taken by the applicant excluding the period taken to prepare and provide the proceedings was within thirty days.…

…It has not been guilty of laches or of any inordinate delay. Realising that service might be defective it vehemently and extensively tracked the first respondent's managing director to his residence. Despite Mr.…

…In reply the advocate for the respondent noted the application had been brought within an inordinate delay. That in fact the application had not been made by good faith.…

…After such inordinate delay the appellant was entitled to assume, the revival of suit (not attempted before expiry of limitation) had been abandoned and to regulate his affair of suit or to develop the same.”…

…given in East Africa than in England by order LVIII rule 15 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, the mistake of a legal adviser could amount to sufficient cause, though in that case there was held to be no mistake but merely inordinate…

…delay, a factor which weighed with the court in Gachau v Karau (supra).…

…given in East Africa than in England by order LVIII rule 15 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, the mistake of a legal adviser could amount to sufficient cause, though in that case there was held to be no mistake but merely inordinate…

…delay, a factor which weighed with the court in Gachau v Karau (supra).…

…poisonous gaseous products, that but for the delay in obtaining medical certificate and for protracted negotiations with the Attorney-General he would have filed an action in time and therefore that there had not been any inordinate…

…delay on his part in filing a suit.…