Judgment[1995] KEHC 125
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 2213 OF 1991 DEVA SAMAT KESHWALA & 10 OTHERS.....................APPLICANTS VERSUS TOLK INVESTMENTS (K) LTD..........................................DEFENDANT UNITED NATIONS FOOD PROGRAMME...........................DEFENDANT RULING On the 15.12.92 I dismissed the application filed by the second defendant on 10.2.92. That application sought an order that the name of the second defendant be struck out and the suit against the
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO 853 OF 1995 M M …………………........……PLAINTIFF VERSUS D C J ……………………..1ST DEFENDANT V N K ……………………2ND DEFENDANT RULING M M, the Plaintiff herein, seeks an interlocutory injunction to restrain D C J, the 1st Defendant, from contracting a marriage under Marriage Act (Cap. 150) of the Africa Christian Marriage and Divorce Act (Cap.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO 235 OF 1995 KENINDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ……PLAINTIFF VERSUS BHAI O M AL-AMIN………………..…………..DEFENDANT RULING The Defendant seeks to set aside an ex-parte judgement entered against him in default of appearance. He does not deny that he was served with summons to enter appearance but failed to do so.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI Civil Appeal 134 of 1994 1. OLONGIDA OLE NGILORITI 4.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
rule 5, make provision for the same remedy he did not think there was any conflict. The two orders merely provide different grounds for the remedy, he said.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
Macharia v Mungai (Civil Appeal 85 of 1990) [1995] KECA 165 (KLR) (18 October 1995) (Judgment) G.K. Macharia & another v Lucy N.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 706 OF 1992 DIONYSIUS OMAMBIA ONYINKWA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY.............................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff herein alleged in his plaint that he was so unlawfully dismissed from his employment with the defendant that he should be awarded compensatory damages by this Court. In the course of his evidence he vehemently denied or rejected the defence’s contention that his conduct ha
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, AKIWUMI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 92 OF 1989 BETWEEN CORNELIUS K.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:A.B. SHAH) CIVIL APPEAL 149 OF 1991 BETWEEN JOSEPHOCHIENG PHILIPKAFUANDE HENRY HEGGA (Trading as AQUILINE AGENCIES)…....................APPELLANTS VERSUS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO.................
Division and case type: CivilORIGINATING SUMMONS
The respondents swear that they were prepared to accept the applicants papers if they were in order despite the order from the Chief Magistrate, Nakuru if the same were presented within the prescribed time. No attempt was made to present the papers within the prescribed time.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
The respondents swear that they were prepared to accept the applicants papers if they were in order despite the order from the Chief Magistrate, Nakuru if the same were presented within the prescribed time. No attempt was made to present the papers within the prescribed time.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
was not a party to the suit in the superior court; and the learned trial judge’s error in making orders regarding the burial of the deceased which were incapable of performance. In regard to the foregoing grounds of appeal, counsel for the appellants, Miss Abida Ali who appeared with Miss Betty Murungi, submitted that the fact that the deceased became apostate did not dissolve his marriage to the rst appellant as there was no evidence that that fact was communicated to her.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gachuhi, Omolo & Lakha JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 139 OF 1989 BETWEEN DANIEL M. NJAI ............................APPELLANT AND HIGH VIEW FARM LTD...................RESPONDENT GEORGE N.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, OMOLO & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 83 OF 1995 BETWEEN BAMBURI PORTLAND CEMENT CO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: GACHUHI, KWACH & OMOLO JJ A ) CIVIL APPEAL NO 159 OF 1994 BETWEEN CAR & GENERAL (K) LIMITED ...........................APPELLANT AND DIAMOND TRUST OF KENYA LIMITED ..............RESPONDENT (Appeal from the ruling and subsequent decree of the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Justice Wambilyangah) dated 23rd March, 1994 in HCCC No 17 of 1993) *********************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT We think this appeal is clearly devoid of any merit. The appella
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:Gicheru, Kwach & Tunoi, JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 14 OF 1989 Between MAINA KANIARU..........................................APPELLANT JANE WAHITO...............................................APPELLANT AND JOSEPHAT M. WANG'ONDU.........................RESPONDENT (An appeal from the judgment of Hon Mr Justice Mbogholi-Msagha delivered on 18th March, 1988 in HCCC No 2556 of 1986) **************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
matter than the appellate tribunal can be; and the appellate tribunal will generally defer to the conclusion which the trial judge has formed”. LORD WRIGHT, in the course of his speech at p.265, said: “Two principles are beyond controversy.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (CORAM:GICHERU, AKIWUMI & SHAH, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 33 OF 1995 BETWEEN MWITA MERENGO………………………….APPELLANT AND WEREMA MERENGO………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment/order of the High Court of Kenya at Kisii (Mabaluto , J.) dated 14th September, 1994 IN H.C.C.