Search court decisions

…A defendant who is served personally has an opportunity to put questions to and seek clarication from the Court Process Server about the summons.…

…It is not expecting too much of court process servers to try and try again to serve the defendant before embarking on the other means of service.…

…It seeks to stop the prosecution of the petition and its striking out for being frivolous, vexatious, an abuse of the court process and meant to embarrass the company.…

…It is contended by the petitioner that the application be struck out as a sham and abuses the court process. As the goods were supplied in 1996 to 1997, the company does not show liability has ever been disputed.…

…According to the return of service dated 25th August, 1983 one Frederick Kibuge an authorised court process server went, on 21st July, 1993, to serve the summons on the two defendants at their place of residence in Gachie…

…I would wish the registries to note that the court process servers fully comply with requirements of order V rules 12 and 14 before a judgment in default is entered.…

…The application to strike out the plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process”.…

…The application to strike out her plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process.…

…The application to strike out the plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process”.…

…The application to strike out her plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process.…

…No. 406 of 2001 deals with criminal prosecution and abuse of court process.…

…Elsewhere in the judgment (page 15) the judges had this to say: “A prosecution that is oppressive and vexatious is an abuse of court process.…

…7 Are these proceedings an abuse of the court process and should they be struck out and (sic) on this ground alone. 8 Is the 1st interested party (Kenya Sugar Board) entitled to regulate the quota in law?…

…Issue No. 7: The proceedings were an abuse of court process since the grounds relied on in Misc. 646/04 are relitigated in Misc. 946/04.…

…Machukia Advocate in the firm of Ms Ben Ochieng & Co Advocates has taken up this matter in the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed and has asked that the suit filed by the Plaintiff amounts to an abuse of the court process…

…Consequently the plaint filed in this court and Chamber Summons dated the 12th May 2003 amounts to abuse of the process of court and are hereby struck out under Order VI Rule 13(1) (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…The application was an abuse of the court process and intended to embarrass this Honourable court; ii.…

…His finding was that institution of the present application for revision when Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 was subsisting was an abuse of the court process.…

…He contends that the applicant's suit is an abuse of the court process as there is no cause of action considering that the parties are still married. 4.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…On the 16th December, 1986 a court process server by the name of Justus Eliud Okwatcho filed a return of service averring that on the 24th November, 1986 at 2 pm he served the summons and the plaint upon the 2nd defendant…

…They are not protected as they would be if they were executing court process by virtue of section 6 of the Judicature Act Cap 8.…

…He urged the Court to nd that the applicants are abusing the Court process, and acting in contempt of Court. 35.…

…He urged the Court to nd that the applicants are blatantly abusing Court process, and are acting in contempt of Court, with a sense of impunity. 62.…

…of the court.…

…of the Court.…