Judgment[1984] KEHC 31
JACKSON KIBEI SEREM v REPUBLIC
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA T NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1174 OF 1984 (From Original Convictions and Sentences in Criminal Case No 2331 of 1984 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi: J A Mango Esq.) JACKSON KIBEI SEREM …………………………………………….APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT CORAM: O’KUBASU, J Appellant absent, not wishing to be present and unrepresented, A K Nyairo (State Counsel) for Respondent) J U D G M E N T The appel
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA TA NAIROBI CRIM APP 1004 OF 84 FREDRIC MBURU MUNY ………………………………..APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T CORAM O’KUBSU J D N Ngatia for Appellant C W Gtonye (Principal State Counsel) for Respondent J U D G M E N T The appellant was convicted on the following two counts: - (i) Forgery contrary to section 349 of the Penal Code; and (ii) Making a document without authority Contrary to Section 357 of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Asutia Paul v Republic High Court, at Nairobi November 20, 1984 Abdullah J High Court Criminal Appeal 617 of 1983 Criminal law - motor accident - facts and evidence consistent with both versions - causing death by dangerous driving - effect of disqualification from driving while in prison - whether proper basis was laid for conviction of driver An accident occurred at the junction of General Waruinge Street and 1st Avenue Eastleigh between an Isuzu lorry and a Volkswagen Combi. The driver of
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Othulo v Republic High Court, at Nairobi November 12, 1984 Abdulla J Criminal Appeal 750 of 1984 Criminal law - indecent assault - allegation of frame up - whether the evidence was tainted to warrant reversal of conviction. The appellant was convicted for the offence of indecent assault contrary to section 144(1) of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram: Kneller, Hancox JJA & Nyarangi Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 150 OF 1983 BETWEEN RICHARD KAITANY CHEMAGONG..................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.......................................................................................RESPOND (Appeal from the High Court at Eldoret, Mbaya J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU CRIMINAL APPEAL 38 OF 1984 HENRY NDERITU …………………………………. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 94 OF 1984 MWANGI CHEGE ……………………………………..APPELLANT (Original Accused I) v e r s u s REPUBLIC ……………………………………………..REPSONDENT CONSLOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL 94 OF 1984 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case 13268 of 1983 of the Resident Magistrate’ Court at Makadara, R M Njiru Esq) THIONGO MWANGI …………………………………APPELLANT (Original Accused2) v e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………….RESPONDEN
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CRIMINAL APPEAL 86 OF 83 BETWEEN ANUCHPAND MEGHJI RUPA SHAH VIJAY KUMAR MEGHJI SHAH ……………. APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Kneller Hancox JJ A and Chesoni Ag J A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 37 OF 1984 BETWEEN GILBERT CHEGE ………………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ………………………………………….
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KNELLER, HANCOX & NYARANGI JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 177 OF 1984 BETWEEN KARIUKI & ANOTHER .................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA ( Coram:Kneller, Hancox JJA & Chesoni Ag JA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 1984 BETWEEN MBELLE......................................................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC............................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Mombasa, Bhandari J)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Parliament until 1979, when he lost his seat; who would pay them Kshs 36,000 for carrying out that order which was described as ‘the work’. If the prosecution case was accepted there could be no question but that Charles and the second appellant were to be armed with guns when they went to arrest Tenai.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 48 OF 84 DAVID OMUSE ODERA ………………………………… APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT (Appeal from conviction of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Gicheru J) dated 29th November1983 in Criminal Appeal No 372 of 1983) JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT When David Omuse Odera, the appellant therein, appeared before an acting Resident Magistrate at Busia on 27th October 1983 and had the charge of stealing stock contrary
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL 48 OF 84 DAVID OMUSE ODERA ………………………………… APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT (Appeal from conviction of the High Court of Kenya at Kakamega (Gicheru J) dated 29th November1983 in Criminal Appeal No 372 of 1983) JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT When David Omuse Odera, the appellant therein, appeared before an acting Resident Magistrate at Busia on 27th October 1983 and had the charge of stealing stock contrary
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 138 OF 84 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 6156 of 1983 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kibera, P E MAUNDU Esq) PATRICK MUKABI ………………………………………….APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLI C …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT CORAM PORTER J Appellant absent, unrepresented and not wishing to be present, C W Gatonye (Principal State Counsel) for Respondent. ------------------------------- J
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 782 OF 1983 Manyala...............Appellant v Republic................Respondent Criminal law - theft of motor vehicle - identification by sole witness and evidence by purchaser - whether appellant was clearly connected to the crime. The appellant was convicted for the offence of theft of a motor vehicle contrary to section 278 (a) of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 8 OF 84 CHARLES LAMAMBIA ….……………..…………………………….. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC …………………………………………………….……..
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 290 OF 1984 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 3500 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at MakadaraM L Kangatta Esq) MOHAMED MZEE ……………………………………………. APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT CORAM O’KUBASU Appellant absent, unrepresented and not wishing to be present.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 76 OF 1984 OLIVER MUNYAKA KABULU......................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Court Martial at Langata Barracks, Bosire Esq)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI ( Coram:Kneller JA, Chesoni & Nyarangi Ag JJA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL 19 OF 1984 BETWEEN WARINGA..................................................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC..............................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the High Court at Nakuru, Mead J)