Judgment[1990] KEHC 76
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL CASE NO 54 OF 1988 REPUBLIC…………………………..……….....…..PROSECUTOR VERSUS MOHAMMED SHIRAZ HUSSEN …….…………………ACCUSED
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT AT KISII CRIMINAL CASE NO 16 OF 1990 REPUBLIC………………………….. PROSECUTOR VERSUS YIENDE…………………………..........…ACCUSSED
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 842 OF 1983 FATEMI INVESTMENTS LTD…..…………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS BAYUSUF……………..………………….DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1859 OF 1990 GITAO & 5 OTHERS ……………………..…..PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA NATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY……………. DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiffs were members of the defendant Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which I shall henceforth call the Chamber, and which is a company limited by guarantee and having no capital.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: HANCOX CJ, NYARANGI JA, COCKAR Ag JA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 133 OF 1989 KIMURI……………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………….RESPONDENT (Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri, Abdullah J dated 22nd September 1989 in High Court Criminal Appeal No 96 of 1989)
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Tembere v Republic High Court, at Mombasa April 30, 1990 Githinji J Criminal Appeal No 550 of 1989 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No 833 of 1989 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kilifi, P M Ndungu, Esq, RM) Criminal Practice and Procedure – Plea – charge of handling stolen property – nature of the offence – what the plea on such a charge should show. Criminal Law – Handling stolen property – elements of the charge of handling stolen property.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Nganga v Republic Court of Appeal, at Nyeri April 25, 1990 Masime, Gicheru & Cockar JJA Criminal Appeal No 123 of 1989 On April 25, 1990, Masime, Gicheru & Cockar JJA delivered the following Judgment. This is an appeal against a sentence of 10 years imprisonment imposed at the Nyeri High Court on 28th July, 1987 following a plea of guilty by the appellant to a charge of manslaughter.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
stated that the owner of the lorry to show cause why maize and lorry should not be forfeited, that order did not preclude the owner of the maize to appear if he was not the owner of the lorry, and claim his maize. The appellants aware of that order as it was made in their presence at the sitting in which the court had convicted them and during the continuation of the same proceedings as it is apparent from the Court record of the proceedings of that day.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Lwengele & another v Staff Counsel REPUBLIC OF KENYA Court of Appeal, at Kisumu March 27, 1990 Nyarangi, Gicheru JJA & Chesoni Ag JA Criminal Appeal No 23 of 1986 On March 27, 1990, Nyarangi, Gicheru JJA & Chesoni Ag JA delivered the following Judgment. The question which arises in this appeal is, a short one, and we think an easy one.
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO 9 OF 1990 JONATHAN MUNGAI WAINAINA ……………………..APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC………………..……………..........……….RESPONDENT RULING The applicant Jonathan Mungai Wainaina applies to me by chamber summons under section 123(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code for bail pending his trial. He is charged with various offences in the Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisumu and those offences would appear to arise from the circumsta
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gachuhi, Gicheru & Kwach, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 110 OF 1986 BETWEEN LIVINGSTONE OTUNDO................................................................................APPELLANT AND NAIMA MOHAMOUD (A minor who had sued through her next friend Mohamoud Ali)..............................................RESPONDENT (An appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Abdullah, J.) dated the 4th day of November,
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
evidence which could not with diligence have been discovered, have been discovered, after the order sought to the reviewed was made, or for any other sufficient cause. The new discovery made according to the affidavit in support of the application, is that it had come to the attention of counsel for the applicant after the order of this court was made on 1.12.89, that the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Hintz v Mwakima, (1982-88) 1 KAR 482, had held that a personal representative
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: HANCOX CJ, GACHUHI & KWACH JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 40 OF 1989 KENYA MEAT COMMISSION……….....……….. APPELLANT VERSUS RICHARD AMBOGO RADEN …….……..…… RESPONDENT (From a judgment and decree of the High Court at Mombasa, Bosire J, dated the 25th November 1988 in High Court Civil Case No 490 of1984) JUDGMENTS Hancox CJ.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL 18 OF 89 Munga Concrete Works Ltd.......................appellant v Industrial Development Bank Ltd..............respondent Judgment. The background facts giving rise to this appeal can be stated briefly.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 61 OF 1989 Kangethe..........................................................appellant v Republic......................................................respondent Judgment. The appellant in this case was charged before the chief magistrate’s court Nairobi, in two counts with stealing by clerk contrary to section 281 of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL, AT MOMBASA Masime, Cockar JJA & Omolo Ag JA Criminal Appeal No 58 of 1990 Lesidai......................................................appellant v Republic................................................respondent Judgment. The appellant, after trial before the Principal Magistrate in Mombasa Resident Magistrate’s court, was convicted of the offence of robber with violence contrary to section 296(1) of the Penal Code and sentenced to a term of sex (6) yea
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: NYARANGI, GACHUHI & MASIME JJ A) CIVIL APPEAL NO 59 OF 1986 JIWA……………………………..……….. APPELLANT VERSUS JIWA & ANOTHER………...………… RESPONDENTS (Appeal from the Ruling/Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Rauf J) dated 15th July, 1985 in Civil Case No 851 of 1985)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
made under Order VI rule 13. Mr Ombaka said the reference to the order was unnecessary because it related to summary procedure.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
made under Order VI rule 13. Mr Ombaka said the reference to the order was unnecessary because it related to summary procedure.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Nyarangi, Gicheru & Kwach, JJA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 17 OF 1989 Between CLAY GODWIN WAMBULWA............................ APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.........................................................RESPONDENT