Judgment[1998] KECA 220
NYANJA HOLIDINGS LTD & 2 OTHERS v CITY FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118/98) BETWEEN NYANJA HOLDINGS LIMITED GEORGE NJAU MBUGUA NYANJA MRS.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OWUOR, J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 62/99) BETWEEN MOSES KIPNGETICH KURGAT ..............................APPLICANT AND THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE LAW SOCIETY ...................................RESPONDENT (Application for stay of execution in an intended appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
The applicants bail is reinstated on similar terms as granted earlier. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 3rd day of June, 1998 J.L.A.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI civ app 249 of 97 ZEBRON NGUKU MOTE...................................APPELLANT V EPHANTUS MOTE WAKARIA.................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is a second appeal and concerns land. A portion of the suit land was being cultivated by the appellant, who is the son of the respondent.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI (CORAM: TUNOI, SHAH & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 329 OF 1995 BETWEEN KITHAKA NTHAKANIO ..................................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) (CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, PALL, JJ.A. & BOSIRE, AG.J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: (BOSIRE AG. JA (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
Upon this, we do not consider that they have an arguable appeal to this Court against the order of the superior which they now seek to have stayed under rule 5 2(b) of the Rules of this Court pending hearing and disposal of their intended appeal. In the result, we think that the two consolidated applications are unmeritorious and the same are dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, LAKHA JJ.A. J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: TUNOI, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Appeal
company and that the respondents would hold the Deed Plan, when released, to the Order of the Acceptances. As this letter is also relevant in the negotiations, I reproduce it’s contents hereunder:- “East African Acceptances Ltd Stanbank House Nairobi Dear Sirs, Galot Industries Ltd Purchase of LR Nos 1337 and 1338/2.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: MULI, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Ahmed v Republic High Court, at Mombasa Mbaluto J December 14, 1992, Mbaluto J delivered the following Ruling. The applicant was convicted in the court below of causing death by obstruction contrary to section 46 of the Traffic Act.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISIONAL ORDER NO 1A OF 1991 SAMWEL NJUGUNA GITHINJI ........................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT ORDER IN REVISION. This is a criminal revision case under s 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU crim app 84 of 89 MUNASIA………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT Judgment. The appellant pleaded guilty and convicted on his plea and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionCivil Suit
may have at least equal rights with him if not superior rights over the property. Consequently I will order that the suit premises remain locked, but after the applicants are given an opportunity to take away from inside the premises what is justly theirs.
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
tends as a direction to the Court hearing the application for Order of Prohibition to grant the Order without using its own discretion whether it should do so. The Attorney-General did not need any authority, nor a reminder, that in the light of the opinions expressed by the Constitutional Court he could terminate the proceedings even when coupled with a wet hope that he would do so.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA MWAURA GATHOGO MUKONO KARANJA .................………………………………………....................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NEPATAO OLE PUNYUA................…………………………......................................