Judgment[1985] KEHC 6
Githunguri v Republic
High Court at NairobiJune,Georgiadis,Lakha Mr,Shapi,Karugu Mr,Kamere Attorney,Chunga,Chunga Chief,GithunguriMiscellaneous Criminal Application 180 of 1985
Division and case type: Anti-CorruptionMiscellaneous Criminal Application
…Mr Chunga in particular referred to paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the affidavit as being totally hearsay, the Court does not act upon hearsay evidence he said.…
…The definition of fact (in the Evidence Act) does not restrict a fact to something which can be exhibited as a material object.…
33 min read