Judgment[1984] KEHC 59
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…In Atito v R (1975) e A 278 at page 281 the court of Appeal held:- “What has caused us concern in this case is whether it was established, having regard to the standard of proof in criminal cases, that the appellant was guilty…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…evidence (ground 1) or that the intention to permanently deprive the complainant company of the properties in question was not supported by evidence (ground 2) or again that the trial magistrate misdirected himself on the standard…
…of proof (ground 3).…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…The standard of proof is the usual one for a civil action, namely, ‘on the balance of probabilities; iii.…
…The onus of proof was on Munini and Musangi and the standard of proof was that of ‘on the balance of probabilities’.…