Search court decisions

…HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Case 6153 of 1992 Locus standi – rate payers – whether a rate payer has sufficient interest to challenge in court the action of a public body whose expenses he contributes – Judicial…

…Review – public authorities – whether public authorities are accountable to a court of law for the lawfulness of their action The applicants are two Nairobi residents and rate payers.…

…Adan v Business Premises Rent Tribunal; Njogu & another (Interested Parties) (Miscellaneous Application E167 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 19177 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (22 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19177…

…(KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) JUDICIAL REVIEW MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E167 OF 2025 RE ABURILI, J DECEMBER 22, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF:- AN APPLICATION BY HUSSEIN MOHAMED ADAN…

…Review.…

…There is no doubt that the remedy of Judicial Review is different from an appeal because what Judicial Review deals with is the process by which the decision was arrived at but not the merits of the Board’s decision.…

…Review.…

…There is no doubt that the remedy of Judicial Review is different from an appeal because what Judicial Review deals with is the process by which the decision was arrived at but not the merits of the Board’s decision.…

…The remedy would be with an application by way of a judicial review.…

…This although the advocate for the defendant is correct in arguing that this court has no jurisdiction to hear matters under the Physical Planning Act of 1996 the Court has a right and jurisdiction to hear judicial review…

…requirements of Order 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules in that it fails to distinguish between averments of knowledge and belief or grounds and source of the same, thirdly, that quashing the Commissioner’s action ought to be by a Judicial…

…Review application for certiorari and order for reinstatement.…