Judgment[1984] KEHC 39
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
conviction set aside and order that each be released forthwith unless otherwise, lawfully held. As for Julius Omando who confessed on oath to having stolen the complainant’s clothes, I direct that he be investigated further.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA T NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 1174 OF 1984 (From Original Convictions and Sentences in Criminal Case No 2331 of 1984 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi: J A Mango Esq.) JACKSON KIBEI SEREM …………………………………………….APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT CORAM: O’KUBASU, J Appellant absent, not wishing to be present and unrepresented, A K Nyairo (State Counsel) for Respondent) J U D G M E N T The appel
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA TA NAIROBI CRIM APP 1004 OF 84 FREDRIC MBURU MUNY ………………………………..APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………………. RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T CORAM O’KUBSU J D N Ngatia for Appellant C W Gtonye (Principal State Counsel) for Respondent J U D G M E N T The appellant was convicted on the following two counts: - (i) Forgery contrary to section 349 of the Penal Code; and (ii) Making a document without authority Contrary to Section 357 of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Asutia Paul v Republic High Court, at Nairobi November 20, 1984 Abdullah J High Court Criminal Appeal 617 of 1983 Criminal law - motor accident - facts and evidence consistent with both versions - causing death by dangerous driving - effect of disqualification from driving while in prison - whether proper basis was laid for conviction of driver An accident occurred at the junction of General Waruinge Street and 1st Avenue Eastleigh between an Isuzu lorry and a Volkswagen Combi. The driver of
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
Othulo v Republic High Court, at Nairobi November 12, 1984 Abdulla J Criminal Appeal 750 of 1984 Criminal law - indecent assault - allegation of frame up - whether the evidence was tainted to warrant reversal of conviction. The appellant was convicted for the offence of indecent assault contrary to section 144(1) of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA MWAURA GATHOGO MUKONO KARANJA .................………………………………………....................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NEPATAO OLE PUNYUA................…………………………......................................
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 297 OF 1984 AMOS MBURU GATHAGU..........................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Thika, RN Kamiro Esq)
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
advocates for all the parties had agreed on the quotum of damages and hence the following consent order was recorded by this court. “By consent judgment for the plaintiff against all the defendants jointly and severally in the inclusive sum of shs 2,153,500 inclusive of costs with court disbursements to be paid by the defendants.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 94 OF 1984 MWANGI CHEGE ……………………………………..APPELLANT (Original Accused I) v e r s u s REPUBLIC ……………………………………………..REPSONDENT CONSLOLIDATED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL 94 OF 1984 (From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case 13268 of 1983 of the Resident Magistrate’ Court at Makadara, R M Njiru Esq) THIONGO MWANGI …………………………………APPELLANT (Original Accused2) v e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………….RESPONDEN
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT NO 1786 OF 1984 ANASTASIA KAMENE CHEGE…………………………………………......................PLAINTIFF AND LAWRENCE NDUATI KIGUTA…………………………………………....................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 138 OF 84 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 6156 of 1983 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kibera, P E MAUNDU Esq) PATRICK MUKABI ………………………………………….APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLI C …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT CORAM PORTER J Appellant absent, unrepresented and not wishing to be present, C W Gatonye (Principal State Counsel) for Respondent. ------------------------------- J
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE N0.4071 OF 1983 H C B MISTRI CHSHA.......................…………….…………………….................... PLAINTIFFS As personal representatives of the late C B Mistri AND B P BAGA t/a A BC CLOTHING FACTORY ....………………..............................
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL APPEAL 782 OF 1983 Manyala...............Appellant v Republic................Respondent Criminal law - theft of motor vehicle - identification by sole witness and evidence by purchaser - whether appellant was clearly connected to the crime. The appellant was convicted for the offence of theft of a motor vehicle contrary to section 278 (a) of the Penal Code.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 751 OF 1977 1. BEATRICE MUSANGI...........................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS MARGARET NZAMBI...............................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Parliament at the next or any subsequent session. They therefore became invalid and detention orders made became null and void ab initio.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 290 OF 1984 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No 3500 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at MakadaraM L Kangatta Esq) MOHAMED MZEE ……………………………………………. APPELLANT V e r s u s REPUBLIC …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT CORAM O’KUBASU Appellant absent, unrepresented and not wishing to be present.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 35 OF 1983 REPUBLIC.......................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS HASMUKH MEGHJI SHAH.......................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL 357 OF 1983 OKELLO ODERO..................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..........................................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court, at Machakos)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO 1150 OF 1983 PETER NJENGA……………………………………………………………....PAINTIFF VERSUS JAMES FINLAY (E A) HOLDINGS LTD………………………….................1ST DEFENDANT ENDESHA LTD……………………………………………………................2ND DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff/applicant moved the court by way of Chamber Summons dated 2nd September 1983 for orders that the defendant’s herein be restrained from borrowing further sums of money using a security
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
seeking inter alia an order vacating the caution, and on an interlocutory motion obtained an order vacating the caution. On appeal the Court of Appeal held that the court had power on motion under s 82(1) of the Land Registration Act 1925 to order that a caution be vacated when it was shown that the caution ought not to have been made.