Judgment[1993] KEHC 114
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…For the prosecution case to succeed, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to prove that each and every averment of fact contained in the affidavit of the appellant complained of was false and in particular as regards of…
…As I have already stated, the appellant stood by each and every event of fact in his affidavit.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…The application is also supported by the applicant’s 32 paragraphs supporting affidavit, whose contents I find unnecessary to set out herein; in view of the nature of the instant applicant.…
…It is clear from the foregoing that it is not necessary to resort to filing of affidavits and submissions in support of or in opposition to an application for revision.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…The Notice of Motion was supported by the affidavit of Kiraitu Murungi sworn on December 1, 1986.…
…In paragraph 13 of his affidavit, Mr Kiraitu set out in detail what the appellant had said about that ill-treatment.…
Division and case type: CriminalMiscellaneous Criminal Application
…The application was supported by an affidavit deponed to and signed by the applicant’s counsel Mr G B M Kariuki which comprised of 25 paragraphs. There was however, no replying affidavit from the respondent.…
…In paragraph 8 of the supporting affidavit counsel complained that the lower court failed – (a) to frame the charge, (b) to read over and explain to the applicant and his co-accused the charge so framed and to inform them…