Judgment[1983] KEHC 12
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 23 OF 1983 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.1208 of 1982 of the District Magistrate's Court at Kikuyu KamauNjuguna Esq.) JOSEPH NJUGUNA KAMAU ........... APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT CORAM: O'Kubasu (J) Appellant absent, not wishing to be present and unrepresented.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 23 OF 1983 (From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.1208 of 1982 of the District Magistrate's Court at Kikuyu KamauNjuguna Esq.) JOSEPH NJUGUNA KAMAU ........... APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………….RESPONDENT CORAM: O'Kubasu (J) Appellant absent, not wishing to be present and unrepresented.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 1983 JAMES ODEMBA OTIENO...............................APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.......................................................RESPONDENT (Appeal from Conviction and Sentence of the Court Martial at 7th Kenya Rifles Langata Barracks, Nairobi)
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (CORAM: MADAN, KNELLER JJA & CHESONI AG JA) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 1983 BHANDARI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY …………………… APPELLANT VERSUS STANDARD JOINERY & BUILDING COMPANY…….…….… RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
In view of this defence and the issue framed upon it, I drew the attention of the learned counsel to order XIV, rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and it was agreed that the 10th issue be determined as preliminary issue by the court. In support of this defence Mr Nowrojee (with Mr I Kapila for the defendants) referred me to various passages in The Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents, 4th edition volume 9 and Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th edition, volume 18, the substance of which is th
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 815 OF 1983 TOLLEY…….......………………….. APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………..………… RESPONDENT
Division and case type: Employment and Labour RelationsCase number Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CAUSE NO. 2644 OF 1982 MABATI LIMITED………....………………………..........APPLICANT VERSUS VG PATEL & SONS LTD….......……..…………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU (Coram: Madan and Kneller, JJ A and Chesoni, Ag. 32 OF 1982) civ app 32 of 82 BETWEEN ANDREW A APIYO ………………………..…………… APPELLANT AND MICHAEL M O MASHERE …………………………… RESPONDENT (Appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Eldoret (Mbaya, J) dated 7th May, 1982 in Civil Case No.
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAKURU ( Coram: Madan, Potter JJA & Chesoni Ag JA ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. JOHN GABRIEL GITAU KAMAU...................................................APPELLANTS AND REPUBLIC..........................................................................................RESPONDENT