Search court decisions

…DEFENDANT RULING This case was on 24th February, 1989, posted to come for hearing with effect from 21st November, 1989, for four days.…

…The application was posted to come for hearing on the day the hearing of the suit was to commence. Consequently it became necessary to consider it before embarking on the hearing of the suit.…

…RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal. It is made under O XLI rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…The main ground upon which the application has been based is that they were not served with a hearing notice informing them of the date of trial. This suit was fixed to come for a hearing on 2nd March, 1989.…

…Consequently it became necessary to issue and serve upon them a hearing notice.…

…It was bearing the hearing dated of 21.7.04 but actual hearing was actually 1.9.04.…

…In any event the 2nd respondent was served with this application, but therein it was not indicated that its hearing had been moved to 1-9-04.…

…The suit came for hearing on three different occasions, thereafter, but was on each occasion adjourned for one reason or another.…

…It was called and was listed to come for hearing on 9th and 10th May, 1989. On 9th May 1989 the suit was called.…

…Thereafter the suit became ripe for hearing but no date for that purpose appears to have been fixed.…

…That application was listed for hearing on April 14, 1983.…

…Thereafter the hearing was adjourned and it would appear from the record that Mr Mganga was unable to continue with the trial and the case was taken over by Mr Magolo, an Acting Resident Magistrate.…

…He first appears on record on 13th January 1988 when he fixed the hearing for 5th April 1988.…

…Simultaneously, the Petitions led on application under certicate of urgency for the following interim orders:- That pending the hearing and determination of the summons inter partes the court be pleased to issue conservatory…

…That sections 30,31,32,33 and 34 of the constitution of Kenya Review Act2008 be suspended pending the hearing and determination of the Petition. 4. On 18.12.09, the Hon.…

…He has lodged an appeal to this court against conviction and sentence and now applies to be released on bail pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.…

…However, since I have seen that there not so many appeals in Mombasa, I cannot see why the hearing of this particular one should take long to dispose of.…

…He has lodged an appeal to this court against conviction and sentence and now applies to be released on bail pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.…

…However, since I have seen that there not so many appeals in Mombasa, I cannot see why the hearing of this particular one should take long to dispose of.…

…Both the applications which had been served upon the Appellant’s advocate were fixed for hearing on 30th march 2006 before the Principal Magistrate who had jurisdiction in the matter.…

…Thereupon counsel for the Appellant walked out after his oral application for stay of the proceedings to enable him appeal against that order to proceed with the hearing of the applications was refused.…

…In making reference to Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020, he indicated that it came up for hearing on 28th July, 2020 before Judge E.…

…It was submitted that the lower court case came up for hearing on 29th July, 2020 but Mr.…

…The motion first came for a hearing on 25th April, 1989. Mr Mburu appeared for the applicant, while Mr Paul Kiambo appeared for the respondent, the defendant in the action.…

…He was allowed time up to 4th May, 1989, when the application next came for a hearing. He came up with a very recent English case of Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council and Another [1988] 3 All ER 737.…

…Originally as the plaint stood, Coast Hauliers were not even a party to the suit and it was only during the course of the hearing that Mr Khanna who appeared for the then sole plaintiff ie Highway carriers Ltd realised that…

…He has not even appeared at the hearing. www.kenyalawreports.or.ke Nevertheless this court does not dispense justice in the abstract. The justice it dispenses must be in accordance with the law.…

…consider the nature of the action, the defence, however irregularly it may have been brought to the notice of the court and the question of whether the plaintiff can be reasonably compensated by costs for to deny a subject a hearing…

…the notice of the Court, however, irregularly, should be considered, the question whether the plaintiff can be reasonably compensated by costs for any delay occasioned should always be remembered that to deny a subject a hearing…

…At the hearing of the suit the Plaintiff’s witnesses adduced evidence to the effect that c. the accident was due to the negligence of the 1st defendant who was the 2nd defendant’s servant. They were duly cross-examined.…

…Pandya for the Plaintiff was to supply the Court with his submissions within seven days from the date of the hearing. Mrs.…

…them agree that they did hear about that morning and as I pointed out earlier, D.W.4 did admit that he saw PW.2 talking to D.W.1 that morning.D.W.1 was with these witnesses that morning and it is only him who denies ever hearing…

…CORPORATION ….RESPONDENT COMBINED WAREHOUSE/ALLIED WHARFAGE….RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of the execution of the Ruling of this court dated the 16th of June, 1995 and the orders made therein pending the hearing…

…CORPORATION ….RESPONDENT COMBINED WAREHOUSE/ALLIED WHARFAGE….RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of the execution of the Ruling of this court dated the 16th of June, 1995 and the orders made therein pending the hearing…