Judgment[2003] KEHC 938
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsElection Petition
…After a full and comprehensive review and consideration a bench of 5 (five) Judges of the Court of Appeal ruled that rule 14 is inconsistent with section 20(1)(a) of the Act and therefore the rule has to give way to the provisions…
…in the Court of Appeal rules but outside 30 days prescribed under the Act.…