Search court decisions

…held by the Court of Appeal, reversing the judge, that although the proposed plaintiff knew that he was suffering from silicosis in July, 1966, the fact that his silicosis was attributable to the negligence of or breach of statutory…

…duty of the proposed defendants was a material fact of a decisive character unknown to him until July 1967.…

…The fact that the appellant was represented by an advocate did not discharge the trial Magistrate from his statutory duty to the appellant.…

…The effect of this section must be that the 2nd respondent was under a statutory duty to hold its annual meeting somewhere after 30th June and in any case on or before the 15th August, 1993, and that was a duty which it could…