Judgment[2019] KEHC 486
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsConstitutional Petition
…Even though the defendants were served and an Affidavit of service duly filed, they neither filed any responses nor attended court to oppose the application.…
…The consequence is that the application was thus deemed unopposed and was ordered to be heard in the absence of the Defendants/respondents. 4.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Case
…has an oversight jurisdiction over the exercise of the Attorney General’s power to terminate criminal prosecutions. (6) The Attorney General’s exercise of discretion to terminate proceedings can only be challenged by an application…
…The private prosecutor will be required to first make an application before the High Court challenging the exercise of the Attorney General discretion. (10) The Constitution section 26 (8) guarantees the Independence of the…
Division and case type: CRIMINAL DIVISIONCriminal Appeal
…Accordingly they applied under the priviso to that section for the admission of their respective appeals out of time by applications dated July 19, 1984.…
…Their applications came before Bhandari, J, on the August 23, 1984, on which occasion it was stated that the appellants were absent and unrepresented, and that Mr Metho appeared for the Republic, as he did in this Court.…