Search court decisions

…The issue of jurisdiction was decided, “on the evidence” before Golf, J.…

…It is immaterial whether the evidence is scanty or limited. Scanty or limited facts constitute the evidence before the court.…

…Reference was made to the three dates ie September 25, 26, and 27, 1976 whose evidence the judge bore in mind and which was not challenged by the plaintiff in his evidence.…

…The judge referred to the defendant’s evidence that the plaintiff stole from the defendant on September 18, 1976 and held that the evidence was not strictly admissible and added, “the court, therefore, disregards all evidence…

…If those pieces of evidence were taken away, Mr Prinja said, the rest of the evidence did not take the case any further.…

…In response to this evidence, the appellant made an unsworn statement.…

…The contradiction in the evidence of Mutunga and assistant chief is more than obvious.…

…The evidence of Mutunga that he took the roll of bhang tied in a cigarette packet to the assistant chief cannot be believed if the evidence of the assistant chief is accepted.…

…In this case the categorical evidence of recognition of the appellants both of whom heard her evidence and had opportunity to refute those statements.…

…The complaints in grounds 2 and 4 of the appeal are that the alibi evidence of both appellants were summarily dismissed without due consideration and that the judgment was against the weight of the evidence.…

…There is no other evidence, direct or circumstancial, to corroborate the evidence of the complainant.…

…evidence can be safely accepted as true and free from the possibility of error.…

…The evidence of PW 2 is not as specifically supported by other evidence as that of PW 1 and I warn myself of the danger of accepting his evidence.…

…In this case I am satisfied that the evidence of PW 2 is acceptable considered in relation to the evidence of PW 1, PW 6, PW 7 and the doctor, and may be acted upon.…

…Evidence is not to be pleaded.…

…The previous driver who had the car since morning is unknown and as such did not give evidence. The evidence of the plaintiff has been corroborated by the two defence witness.…

…Grounds 1 and 5 of the appeal have expressed the appellant’s disbelief over the acceptance of the sole evidence of the complainant about the incident as against the appellant’s evidence (unsworn statement ) and his action…

…The evidence of the sole prosecution witnesses to the incident, that is the evidence of the complainant, was fully corroborated by that of the other four Tanzanians who had contributed to the sum that was brought by the complainant…

…From the evidence of the complainant Patel (PW1) the appellant did not stop at the T-junction as he joined Kilunhga street. It would appear that the appellant was coming from the left-hand side junction.…

…The appellant in his evidence testified that he was on his correct side of the road when the complainant came driving on his wrong side of the road and hit him.We have now examined the evidence on record and it is clear that…

…The learned magistrate considered all the evidence and accepted the evidence of the police officers with regard to finding of rounds of ammunitions in the coat at the house of the appellant.…

…It was not necessary to call the suspects for robbery who pointed out the house of the appellant unless the circumstances so required such evidence.…

…There is no evidence by the complainant to prove that the same belonged to him.…

…in order for it to be proved and failure to bring medical evidence is not fatal to the case and the sentence was well merited.…

…accident which was adduced in evidence by consent.…

…Such evidence does not tend to show that before the accident the plaintiff was planning a naval career.…

…He made no further mention of any alibi in his evidence. Halima was called to testify for the prosecution. She was declared a hostile witness.…

…John Maina however did not say in his evidence that the appellant spoke these words “toka inje”- when the robbery was committed.…

…The evidence of the search and finding of the drugs was given by three Administration Policemen (APC Edward Kiengo (P.W.1), APC Peter Kahome (P.W.2) and APC Kilei Mbogo (P.W.4).…

…There is no evidence sufficient to raise any presumption of possession against the appellants.” This is a judgment of this Court and we are bound as usual to accord it utmost respect.…

…The grounds of appeal are mainly that the evidence upon which he was convicted was insufficient and that his confession was retracted and uncorroborated.…

…Mr Nyaga for the state did not support the conviction and on by own assessment of the evidence I am in agreement with both counsels that the conviction was unsafe.…

…The trial magistrate accepted the evidence of the record kept by the technician as well as evidence of the butchers but the appellant had not been issuing receipts any of them.…

…I have carefully gone through all the evidence adduced before the trial court.…

…I have considered the grounds of appeal filed by both appellants and the record of the evidence.…

…The complainant did not identify the 1st appellant and the only evidence of the identification of the 1st appellant was that of PW 2 who was an accomplice and also a minor so that his evidence needed corroboration in law…

…The petition contained points like the Learned Trial Magistrate did not record all the evidence tendered (this did not come out clearly in Mr.…

…The evidence shows that only P.W.2 saw him cutting down the crops. The others P.W.3 and 4 did not.…