Judgment[1999] KEHC 37
MAECEOM CONSULTANTS v KERIO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
High Court at EldoretCase number Civil Suit 40 of 1998
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
…The defendants’ response to the foregoing letter is not exhibited but it appears that there was a further revision by the plaintiffs vide their letter dated 26/5/97 Ref.…
…The defendants did not respond to that application and in fact to date no response has been filed. On the date fixed for the hearing inter parties is when the consent was struck and recorded.…
application is refusedDismissed35 min read