Search court decisions

…It seeks to stop the prosecution of the petition and its striking out for being frivolous, vexatious, an abuse of the court process and meant to embarrass the company.…

…It is contended by the petitioner that the application be struck out as a sham and abuses the court process. As the goods were supplied in 1996 to 1997, the company does not show liability has ever been disputed.…

…According to the return of service dated 25th August, 1983 one Frederick Kibuge an authorised court process server went, on 21st July, 1993, to serve the summons on the two defendants at their place of residence in Gachie…

…I would wish the registries to note that the court process servers fully comply with requirements of order V rules 12 and 14 before a judgment in default is entered.…

…That the powers under that Section are used for the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of the court process.…

…Plaintiffs counsel said the application is mischievous and is an abuse of the court process for it seeks to deny the plaintiff remedy against the other defendants.…

…The application to strike out the plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process”.…

…The application to strike out her plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process.…

…The application to strike out the plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process”.…

…The application to strike out her plaint is thus premature and is an abuse of the court process.…

…(d) In abuse of the Court process, the Petitioner has enjoyed the conservatory orders since 3rd December, 2014 without taking any further action to determine the Petition. e.…

…Obuo that where a party is seemingly enjoying conservatory orders; refuses and or declines to file submissions for over five months, then such a party should not enjoy interim orders as it is acting in abuse of Court process…

…The application was an abuse of the court process and intended to embarrass this Honourable court; ii.…

…His finding was that institution of the present application for revision when Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 was subsisting was an abuse of the court process.…

…Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act gives this court inherent powers to make such orders as may be necessary for ends of justice to be met or to prevent abuse of the process of the court.…

…The power to strike out proceedings for abuse of court process is discretionary. In this case, the abuse complained of was beyond Plaintiff/Respondent’s control.…

…More importantly there was already on the record an application by the Respondents dated 1st August 2006, seeking to strike out the suit on the grounds the same was frivolous, vexatious and otherwise an abuse of the Court…

…process.…

…More importantly there was already on the record an application by the Respondents dated 1st August 2006, seeking to strike out the suit on the grounds the same was frivolous, vexatious and otherwise an abuse of the Court…

…process.…

…For the appellant to purport to resurrect the issue three years after the determination of his appeal is a clear indication that the petition is frivolous and an abuse of the Court process.…