Judgment[2006] KECA 380
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…7 Are these proceedings an abuse of the court process and should they be struck out and (sic) on this ground alone. 8 Is the 1st interested party (Kenya Sugar Board) entitled to regulate the quota in law?…
…Issue No. 7: The proceedings were an abuse of court process since the grounds relied on in Misc. 646/04 are relitigated in Misc. 946/04.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…More importantly there was already on the record an application by the Respondents dated 1st August 2006, seeking to strike out the suit on the grounds the same was frivolous, vexatious and otherwise an abuse of the Court…
…process.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
…More importantly there was already on the record an application by the Respondents dated 1st August 2006, seeking to strike out the suit on the grounds the same was frivolous, vexatious and otherwise an abuse of the Court…
…process.…
Division and case type: CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISIONCivil Appeal
…For the appellant to purport to resurrect the issue three years after the determination of his appeal is a clear indication that the petition is frivolous and an abuse of the Court process.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…of the court.…
…of the Court.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…of court.…
…That refusal was viewed by the respondents as unreasonable and amounted to an abuse of the process of the court.…