Search court decisions

…APPLICATION NO.NAI. 214 OF 1998 BETWEEN NATIONAL CEREALS & PRODUCE BOARD.......................APPLICANT AND ALBERT ONGARO..........................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G I have read the notice of motion and the affidavit…

…In a supporting affidavit sworn by Mr Wandaka the advocate who had the conduct of the suit, it is deponed that the applicant’s firm of advocates applied for proceedings and judgment on June 5, 1986, two days after the judgment…

…Mr Jowhal for the respondent had a quarrel with the facts of the affidavit in support of the application.…

…in the affidavits.…

…One Arthur Ndegwa, a surrogate of the Commissioner swore an affidavit which cannot be described as a simple affidavit.…

…In a supporting affidavit, it was deponed on behalf of the applicants that in the year 1986, each applicant was a final year student at the respondent college.…

…Now I need to refer to the affidavits which were sworn on behalf of the college. On January 11, 1989, the College Registrar swore an affidavit in answer to the notice of motion.…

…There was only one accompanying affidavit in support and that was by Nyamogo, the 1st applicant. The detailed acts of refusal are deponed to therein.…

…However, in his replying affidavit sworn on 16th November, 1993, and filed on the same day Mr Malakwen states and we quote: “I have now seen the notice of motion dated 28th October, 1993, and an affidavit sworn by one Mr…

…It is not in dispute that the first respondent has not in all the pleadings, correspondents, affidavits and documents disclosed its physical address. Its only address is given as P. O. Box 88892, Mombasa.…

…XXXVI rule 3D of the Civil Procedure Rules – the Rules provides that: “3D (1) An application under section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act shall be made by Originating Summons. (2) The summons shall be supported by an affidavit…

…Summons dated 28th October, 1991 which was subsequently amended on 13th February, 1992 and filed in the superior court on the following day and re-amended on 24th March, 1993 annexed to which was the requisite supporting affidavit…

…In his ruling the learned judge was clearly conscious of the fact that the application then before him could not be decided on a consideration of the opposing affidavits, but that, having regard to those affidavits, it was…

…Mr Lakha began by referring to Mr Panesar’s affidavit of September 23 in which he specifically refuted the suggestion that Dynamics Engineering Ltd was ever intended to be run as a partnership.…

…I have found that I cannot decide on such issues on affidavit evidence alone, I have to hear the oral evidence. ... I will now go ahead and hear oral evidence in this case.".…

…that the proceedings should for any reason be continued as if the cause had been begun by filing a plaint, it may order the proceedings to continue as if the cause had been so begun and may, in particular, order that any affidavits…

…The appellant explained the grounds of his absence in support of his application in the affidavits he swore on November 30, 1981, and April 13, 1983.…

…The first affidavit was in support of the application filed by DM Mareka, advocate, but withdrawn on March 3, 1983, and the second affidavit was in support of the renewed application which the appellant himself filed in April…

…In a subsequent affidavit sworn by Mr. Mohamed on 7th October, 2004, he admitted, as contended by Mr.…

…In response to the matters deponed to above, an affidavit in reply was sworn by a Manager of Aberdare, Mr.…

…Clearly there existed triable issues in this case not the least of which was as to the acreage of the land offered for settlement as the Affidavits and exhibited correspondence filed in the High Court in support of and against…

…However, the Affidavits and the letters exchanged between the representatives of the parties produced before the High Court during the hearing of the Notice of Motion disclosed a divergence of views about the acreage.…

…The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by Mr. Gitobu Imanyara, Advocate who appeared for the Applicant. There are several annexures to the affidavit. I have perused them all.…

…The respondents are relying on two replying affidavits, one sworn by the Chairman of the First Respondent and the other by the returning officer, the Second Respondent.…

…He was taken through the pleadings and the affidavits with their annexures.…

…In his replying affidavit the defendant confirmed what he had put down in writing in his statement of defence. In paras 2 and 3 of that affidavit the defendant says: ‘2.…

…Two affidavits in support of the motion inter alia deponed that the High Court of Kenya had no jurisdiction to entertain the two suits.…

…DELAYS IN COURTS OF BOMBAY By his affidavit the plaintiff’s director was asking the court to take judicial notice of a notorious fact which was within his own knowledge.…

…The replying affidavit filed on behalf of the appellant in opposition to the respondent's application was sworn by it's sales manager, one Mungaithi.…

…It is a detailed affidavit and among the annextures to it are copies of the dishonoured cheques.…

…On May 10, 1979 the defendant’s advocate filed a summons for the setting aside of the ex parte judgment and filed an affidavit in support.…

…There is also an affidavit of the advocate briefed on behalf of the appellant dated July 25, 1979 for consideration.…

…In his affidavits in support of the present application the advocate of the Applicants had deponed that in his view, the notice of appeal was not competent and could not be served on the Respondent, until it had been signed…

…The application is supported by affidavits sworn by ATUL SHAH dated 8th May, 2007 and ROBERT FOULSER dated 24th January, 2007. The application was strongly contested.…

…At page 11 of the same I find an observation by the learned Judge as follows: “That to my view means that either by affidavit or the pleadings the Plaintiff ought to firstly show that the Defendant is likely to leave the…