Search court decisions

…Machukia Advocate in the firm of Ms Ben Ochieng & Co Advocates has taken up this matter in the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed and has asked that the suit filed by the Plaintiff amounts to an abuse of the court process…

…Consequently the plaint filed in this court and Chamber Summons dated the 12th May 2003 amounts to abuse of the process of court and are hereby struck out under Order VI Rule 13(1) (d) of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…The application was an abuse of the court process and intended to embarrass this Honourable court; ii.…

…His finding was that institution of the present application for revision when Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 was subsisting was an abuse of the court process.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…He deponed that the Application and Petition are an abuse of the court process and ought to be struck out in limine. 3rd Respondent’s Replying Adavit 9.…

…The instant Application and Petition is an attempt to sanitize the Petitioner’s criminal and illegal activities, and is an abuse of the process of court as the Petitioner has approached court with unclean hands.…

…They are not protected as they would be if they were executing court process by virtue of section 6 of the Judicature Act Cap 8.…

…The Court had this to say “throwing a bundle of court documents to a party to be served with them does not constitute proper service of court process. It would be ridiculous to extend the rule to that limit”.…