Judgment[2023] KEHC 27253
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsJudicial Review
It was submitted that there is a dispute regarding ownership of the suit properties. That under Order 40 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, where there is proof that any property in dispute is in a danger of being wasted, damaged, alienated or disposed of, the court ought to grant a temporary injunction to restrain such acts.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…No. 946/04 (946/04) seeking further judicial review orders. That is the application that gave rise to the appeal before us. The pleadings………..…
…In sum, it was an abuse of power against which judicial review would lie as was held in Reg v I.R.C. Ex. P.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…A suit by a ratepayer must in law be by judicial review and not a plaint. (3).…
…Mr Ngatia’s other submission was that the matter should have come to Court by way of an application for judicial review.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…About the same time that the respondent filed HCCC Number 45 of 2006, she also filed High court Miscellaneous Civil Application Number 261 of 2006 and obtained leave on 21st March 2006 to apply or judicial review order of…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…RESPONDENT EX PARTE TARUS T/A TARUS & COMPANY ADVOCATES RULING The Court granted leave to the applicant to make an application for Judicial Review which he has done under this Motion.…