Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…Under the Constitution of Kenya (Supervisory jurisdiction and Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedom of the Individual) High Court Practice and Procedure Rule, 2006 directions have been given as to the hearing of a…
…petition which contravention of any fundamental rights and freedoms of an individual under Section 70 to 83 inclusive) of the Constitution is alleged or is apprehended. 9.…
Division and case type: CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS DIVISIONCivil Appeal
…In urging for a remedy for the violations of his fundamental rights, the appellant relied on Article 21 of the Constitution that imposes a duty on the State and every State organ to ensure that fundamental rights are not…
…rights are based on the proceedings in Cr.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsConstitutional Petition
…That as I appear in court, there are two Title deeds over the same suit property whose effects is to interfere with my fundamental rights to own the suit property.”…
…Clearly the issue of interference with the Petitioner's “fundamental rights to own the suit property” will only arise after a determination by the court that his title, as against that of the 1st Respondent, is the valid…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Salmon, J.A. in his dissenting judgment in Cozens, expressed the view that only very clear words which did not exist in the English Limitation Act 1963, could take away a person’s fundamental rights, in the following way:…
…rights which are ordinarily accorded by the law and indeed by natural justice.”.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…What gives us cause for concern, however, is the length to which the judges were prepared to go to justify the illegal detention of the appellant in custody by the police for 17 days in flagrant violation of his fundamental…
…rights.…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…:- “We apply the above doctrine fully and would therefore think that the failure to give all the accused in this case an opportunity to cross-examine the 4th co-accused was no less prejudicial and was indeed a denial of fundamental…
…rights of all the appellants ...........”…