Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…In this case, the hearing notice for today has been served.…
…We are informed by the clerk of the court, that when a notice of hearing is issued, it is not the registry’s practice to specify, in addition, that the application to strike out will be heard because, the appellant being…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…Thereafter, the Tribunal file got lost and the appeal could not be processed for hearing.…
…By a ruling dated 11th June, 2004, the superior court ordered that the dispute be taken back to the Tribunal for hearing de novo and that the appeal be marked as withdrawn with each party bearing its own costs.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…There is inherent power to restore a case for hearing after it has been dismissed under order 16 rule 6. 2.…
…It follows from this quotation that there is an inherent power to restore a case for hearing after it has been dismissed under order 16, r 6.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…In the first of them, Lovelock v Margo [1963] 2 ALL ER, 13 the court rejected further reasons advanced at the hearing for refusing consent to the assignment, and held that the reason given at the time of the refusal amounted…
…last two authorities assist the respondents case here, for it is in dispute on the affidavits that there ever was a refusal of consent, or even an opportunity to refuse it, and the only reason given was advanced at the hearing…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…judge in assessing general damages failed to appreciate or to consider the fact that although the loss of one eye by itself would not be regarded as so serious an injury as the loss of one hand or one leg or the loss of hearing…
…in one ear, the loss of sight in both eyes would be a lot more serious than the loss of two legs or two hands or the total loss of hearing, and he should have awarded damages in the light of awards for such injuries.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…judge in assessing general damages failed to appreciate or to consider the fact that although the loss of one eye by itself would not be regarded as so serious an injury as the loss of one hand or one leg or the loss of hearing…
…in one ear, the loss of sight in both eyes would be a lot more serious than the loss of two legs or two hands or the total loss of hearing, and he should have awarded damages in the light of awards for such injuries.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Appeal
…The suit should be set down for hearing.”…