Search court decisions

…In response to the petition, the 1st respondent filed a replying affidavit and a supplementary replying affidavit.…

…The 2nd respondent filed a replying affidavit sworn by Franklin Kiche and a further replying affidavit sworn by Hellen Juma.…

…The Replying Affidavit and the documents annexed thereto filed by the 2nd Respondent dated 5th April, 2021 be struck out for being filed out of time without the leave of the court. 2.…

…That no explanation has been given by the 2nd Respondent for the inordinate delay in filing the Replying Affidavit and accompanying documents.…

…The 2nd Respondent’s replying affidavit sworn by its Director of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution Brian Ikol on 2/6/2022 was brief.…

…She produced as Exhibits 1-7 the documents annexed in the replying affidavit sworn by Ms. Pamela Lisasa. The witness was cross-examined by Ms. Mwangi.…

…The petitioner filed Grounds of Opposition and a replying affidavit.…

…Rule 15(11) requires the Attorney General to respond through a replying Affidavit. No Replying Affidavit has been filed by the Attorney General.…

…The Replying Affidavit of the 1st Respondent 27.…

…In further response to Paragraph 22 of the 1st Respondent’s Replying Affidavit, it was unreasonable for the 1st Respondent to state at Paragraphs 16 and 17 of their Replying affidavit that on 20th January 2021, it submitted…

…The 2nd respondent called Robert Itambo, who testified as DW1, and relied on a replying affidavit he deposed on 28th November 2024.…

…with the said replying affidavit and being accorded a fair chance to be heard on it.…

…In a replying affidavit sworn on 4/4/2025 by the Petitioners’ advocate, Chesoli Dennis Chebayi, the Petitioners opposed the application.…

…The Applicants shall file and serve their respective replying affidavits in respect of the petition within 21 days of this order. d.…

…The application was opposed vide the Replying Affidavit dated 8/5/2025. I have considered the application, the Replying Affidavit and the oral submissions made by Counsel.…

…The application was opposed vide the Replying Affidavit dated 8/5/2025. I have considered the application, the Replying Affidavit and the oral submissions made by Counsel.…

…The Petition was duly served on the Respondent who opposed the same by filing a Replying Affidavit dated 6th October, 2023 and whose facts are summarised as follows; - The Respondent expressly denied the facts as pleaded…

…The Replying Affidavit by the Respondent was duly served on the Petitioners who filed a Further Affidavit sworn on 11th January2023 that stated as follows; - The Petitioners averred that the Replying Affidavit was largely…

…The 3rd Respondent on behalf of the 2nd to 7th Respondents filed a Replying Affidavit dated 14.03.2025 in response to the present Petition.…

…The 2nd to 7th Respondents opposed the Petitioner’s facts outlined in the present Petition based on the following grounds pleaded in the Replying Affidavit sworn on the 14.03.2025; - The 3rd Respondent confirmed in the Replying…

…The Court has perused the present Petition in details, the Replying Affidavits of the Respondents and the Interested Parties as well as the submissions filed by all the parties.…

…The 1st to 4th Respondents in their Replying Affidavit pleaded that indeed, the 4th Respondent made a Ruling on the 08.08.1991 relating to OBJECTION NO.24 OF 1990 filed by the 6th Respondent.…

…The 1st Respondent opposed Petition No. 3 of 2019 by filing a Replying Affidavit dated 09.07.2019 by one OKENYI SAMUEL ODARI.…

…The 1st Respondent filed a total of 4 Replying Affidavits beginning with a Replying Affidavit dated 9/7/2019 in Petition No. 6 of 2021, a second Replying Affidavit dated 9/7/2019 in Petition No. 3 of 2021, a third Replying…

…In a Replying Affidavit sworn on their behalf on 22nd October 2025 by Mohamed Ahmed Abdalla (the 1st Petitioner), they aver that the application is an abuse of the Court process and an attempt to invite the Court to sit on…

…At paragraph 8 of the Replying Affidavit of Sammy Kimuio Mukiri the 1st Respondent’s director avers as follows: “8.         …

…The petitioner filed submissions dated 31st October 2025 while the respondent relied on their replying affidavit as filed.…

…It is correct as the 11th respondent put it in his replying affidavit that no additional information has been presented in the proposed amendments, and that on the contrary the proposed amendments seek to delete some information…

…The 1st respondent filed the replying affidavit sworn by Carolyne Kinyua, on the 6th March 2026, inter alia deposing that the copies of the green cards for the suit properties annexed by the petitioners show that they were…

…Small notified the court that though the 1st respondent had initially filed a replying affidavit in opposition to the application, she had received instructions from her client to concede to the application.…

…However, it was only the 7th, 8th and 9th Respondents who did oppose the same by filing a Replying Affidavit dated 07.11.2025. 5.   …

…Upon service of the Replying Affidavit by the 7th, 8th and 9th Respondents, the Applicants did not file any Further and/or Supplementary Affidavit thereof. 7.   …

…'RULING By consent, the application dated 7.11.2025 is compromised as follows; The 7th , 8th and 9th Respondents are granted leave of 7 days from today’s date to prepare, file and serve the Replying Affidavit.…

…The application is opposed by the petitioner through the replying affidavit of Harji Govind Ruda, director, sworn on the 30th April 2025, inter alia deposing that the application does not meet the threshold for joinder, as…

…That as deposed in the petitioner’s replying affidavit the applicants were not among the squatters on the suit properties who were engaged in the resettlement discussions or compensated.…