Judgment[1993] KEHC 135
Ujuma v Karim t/a Pambazuka Public Service
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT, AT NAIROBI MARCH 4, 1993 GITHINJI J CIVIL CASE NO 1194 OF 1987 UJUMA ………………………………………....…..….. PLAINTIFF VERSUS KARIM T/A PAMBAZUKA PUBLIC SERVICE…….....DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 4828 of 1987 PAN AFRICA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. …….…….1ST PLAINTIFF AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Ahmed v Republic High Court, at Mombasa Mbaluto J December 14, 1992, Mbaluto J delivered the following Ruling. The applicant was convicted in the court below of causing death by obstruction contrary to section 46 of the Traffic Act.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 368 OF 1992 HABIB BANK LIMITED..........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MOHAMED SHARIFF HASSAN..........DEFENDANT RULING In the suit (as pleaded in the plaint) the plaintiff claims from the defendant a sum of Shs 760,322/65 alleged to be the debit balance of the amount due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff as at 16th April, 1992. This is alleged to be in respect of the bank loan or an overdraft reflected on the defe
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 182 OF 1991 NGANGA GICHURI .............................................1ST PLAINTIFF DAVID KIHANYA NGANGA ................................2ND PLAINTIFF VERSUS NDUNGU NGANGA..................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 4988 OF 1992 DP & OTHERS...........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA TIMES MEDIA TRUST LTD.......................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiffs have brought this suit against the defendants for libel. The plaintiffs obtained a temporary exparte injunction restraining the defendant, one of the national dailies, from repeating the publication of the alleged defamatory matter or of similar
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 649 OF 1991 AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS CONTAINER FREIGHTERS CO LTD................................RESPONDENT RULING This application for summary judgment is brought by way of a notice of motion under order 35 rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. It seeks an order that summary judgment be entered for the plaintiff, Agricultural Development Corporat
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Dola v Attorney General High Court, at Mombasa August 27, 1992 Omolo J Civil Case No. 327 of 1989 August 27, 1992, Omolo J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 581 OF 1988 HECO UBERSEEHANDEL.......................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MAC’S PHARMACEUTICALS LTD ....................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 3102 OF 1988 WATSON MOGERE .............................................PLAINTIFF BENJAMIN OMWANWA.......................................PLAINTIFF FRANCIS KIBORE................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS EAST AFRICAN BUILDING SOCIETY...............DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Jefa v Kenya Ports Authority High Court, at Mombasa June 9, 1992 Omolo J Civil Case No. 721 of 1988 June 9, 1992,Omolo J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
will decree costs in favour of the defendant. In those circumstances, is there really any basis for an order for security of costs?
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL CASE NO 61 OF 1991 GABRIEL NDUNGU KINUTHIA.........................APPLICANT VERSUS GEORGE W WAWERU................................RESPONDENT RULING On 27th December 1991, the plaintiff/applicant filed a suit against the defendant/respondent and claimed from him both general and special damages arising out of an accident which occurred on 16th June 1989 along Nyeri-Nyahururu Road in which the plaintiff/applicant sustained severe injur
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 359 OF 1991 MARTHA WANGARI NJOKA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Kinji Ltd & Another v Kogo & Another High Court, at Mombasa March 31, 1992 Omolo J Civil Case No. 938 of 1991 March 31, 1992, Omolo J delivered the following Ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
will decree costs in favour of the defendant. In those circumstances, is there really any basis for an order for security of costs?
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISIONAL ORDER NO 1A OF 1991 SAMWEL NJUGUNA GITHINJI ........................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT ORDER IN REVISION. This is a criminal revision case under s 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 2317 OF 1980 MAXILLAN JOHN KISAKA.............................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BONDO TRANSPORTERS .......................DEFENDANT DALAS NDEGE............................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Losiamuro v Lochab Brothers & another High Court, at Mombasa December 30, 1991 Wambilyangah J Civil Case No 48 of 1988
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Wamalwa & Company Advocates were not able to meet those requirements. They had to get the Order varied so that they can use another Bank.