Judgment[2000] KEHC 284
JOHN NJOROGE WARUI v UNIVERSAL BANK LTD
High Court at Mombasa
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA John Njoroge Warui vUniversal Bank Ltd High Court of Kenya at Nairobi August 7, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 583 of 2000 This is an application for an injunction under Order 39 rule 1, 2 and 3 and to restrain the defendant from repossessing or taking possession of motor vehicle registration number KAC 031J until the suit filed by the plaintiff/applicant against the defendant/respondent is heard and determined. The application is supported by
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Summary judgement Order 35 r 1 CPR Order 6 r13(b) (c) & (d) Order 12 r 6 CPR REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1232 OF 1998 CORPORATE INSURANCE CO.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA 1 Barry Scutt & Another v Hitesh Jethwa & 2 Others High Court of Kenya at Nairobi June 29, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 937 of 2000 June 29, 2000 T Mbaluto, Judge delivered the following ruling. This ruling relates to the issue as to who between the applicants who are the plaintiffs in this suit and the 3rd defendant/respondent should bear the costs of the application filed by the plaintiffs herein.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Civil Case 108 of 1997 MOSES MWANGI MUCHINA …………….……………......….. AFRICAN LINE TRANSPORT CO.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1759 OF 1999 DAVIS NATHAN CHELOGOI..................................................PLAINTIFF versus DIAMOND TRUST BANK LTD............................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 11th November, 1999 I gave an order of Injunction to restrain the defendant herein from selling alienating or disposing of by public auction or private treaty or in any other way parting with title for property known as L.R.
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: AKIWUMI, SHAH & BOSIRE, JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 224 OF 1999 BETWEEN JASWANT SINGH DHINGRA ..............................APPLICANT AND JASWINDER DHINGRA ..................................RESPONDENT (An application to strike out Notice of Appeal filed herein on 18th day of December, 1998 in an intended appeal from the ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 73 of 1995 1. DENNIS MUYA GACHANJA (minor suing through next friend)...........PLAINTIFFS versus 1.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 3428 OF 1994 JOHN KARANJA GACHINA...........................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS WANGARI KONGU.......................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 933 of 1996 CONTINENTAL DEVELOPERS LTD............................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS SAUTI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS Civil Case 5189 of 1991 JOSEPH NJUGUNA............................................ …………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS CYRUS NJATHI....................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Case 96 of 1996 RAYMOND WOLLEN MILLS…………..……….PLAINTIFF versus KATE MOKI MOKI……………………..……..DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO. 1720 OF 1995 ROSE WAMBUI KIBUI & ANO .....................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
In absence of any indication my brother was correct in proceeding with he trial on 20.3.96 under order 9b CPR. From the evidence before the court the plaintiff stated that he boarded the defendants lorry.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1571 OF 1998 ALEX OKELLO ODIANYA ............................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA Civil Case 76 of 1995 ABDI KAWIRI.....................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS YOU GUO JIANG SIETCO.........................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUNGOMA Civil Case 76 of 1995 ABDI KAWIRI.....................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS YOU GUO JIANG SIETCO.........................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
HALL EQUITORIAL LTD v OLYMIPC FRUIT PROCESSORS: ORDER Ruling delivered. E’ O’KUBASU JUDGE
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
instant case as at 6th July 1995 when the consent letter was written and 24th July 1995 when the order was signed, M/s. Meenye Company advocates was not acting for the plaintiff.
Division and case type: FamilySuccession Cause
REPUBLIC OF KENYA HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) Prob & Admin Cause 172 of 1988 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GATUTHU NJUGUNA (DECEASED) Issue: Whether, under the Law of Succession Act, the Registrar of the High Court has power to perform the duties and carry out responsibilities of an executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased person. RULING I do not intend to write a long ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Alongside the plaint, the plaintiffs filed an application by way of Chamber Summons seeking orders that the plaintiffs be restored by way of a mandatory injunction into possession of L.R. 209/8258 forthwith, that the defendant be restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs’ enjoyment of the suit property until this suit is heard and determined, that the defendants be restrained from interfering with the running of the plaintiffs business on L.R.