Judgment[2009] KEHC 11
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…Under the Constitution of Kenya (Supervisory jurisdiction and Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedom of the Individual) High Court Practice and Procedure Rule, 2006 directions have been given as to the hearing of a…
…petition which contravention of any fundamental rights and freedoms of an individual under Section 70 to 83 inclusive) of the Constitution is alleged or is apprehended. 9.…
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCriminal Appeal
…Mr Justice Muli, as he was then, correctly pointed out in Motichand v Republic (Criminal Application No 21 of 1972) that the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual to his liberty of which the Constitution of the…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…What gives us cause for concern, however, is the length to which the judges were prepared to go to justify the illegal detention of the appellant in custody by the police for 17 days in flagrant violation of his fundamental…
…rights.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…The petitioner challenges the manner in which she was handled by Kenyan Immigration authorities alleging that the respondent infringed her rights and fundamental freedoms in the process.…
…Mr Chigiti contended that confining the petitioner at the Lang’ata Women prison together with other convicts was a breach of her fundamental rights and that she was discriminated against by virtue of her legal status against…
Division and case type: CriminalCriminal Appeal
…:- “We apply the above doctrine fully and would therefore think that the failure to give all the accused in this case an opportunity to cross-examine the 4th co-accused was no less prejudicial and was indeed a denial of fundamental…
…rights of all the appellants ...........”…