Judgment[2025] KEELC 18471
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Environment and LandPetition
Abdirahman & another v National Land Commission & 2 others (Environment and Land Petition E012 of 2025) [2025] KEELC 18471 (KLR) (19 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 18471 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT GARISSA ENVIRONMENT AND LAND PETITION E012 OF 2025 MN GICHERU, J DECEMBER 19, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF: THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010; IN THE MATTER OF: ARTICLES 1, 2, 3, 10(1) & (2), 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 40, 47, 50(1), 60, 61, 62, 66, 67, 68,
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
Ogolla v Onyango Otunga & Company Advocates (Civil Appeal E101 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 27214 (KLR) (27 December 2023) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 27214 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CIVIL APPEAL E101 OF 2023 RE ABURILI, J DECEMBER 27, 2023 BETWEEN GEORGE OGOLLA .................................................................................. APPELLANT AND ONYANGO OTUNGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES ......................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO. LOWE & COMPANY LIMITED …………………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ …………………………1ST DEFENDANT BANK OF AFRICA KENYA LIMITED …………...…….….2ND DEFENDANT REGISTRAR OF TITLES, MOMBASA …………….…….3RD DEFENDANT RULING AND/OR DIRECTIONS A fundamental issue has arisen in respect of the application dated 30.10.2010 by the 1st Defendant and which all parties agree will have crucial consequences or ramifications depe
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
Gikandi argues that he is able to show that it is jurisdictionally possible for conservatory orders to be granted despite the envisaged time-lines in Section 32 of the Act.This is the very subject of his application. In view of the restricted time in Section 32, the application by the Petitioners is made even more urgent.Once more urgent a person alleges contravention of his fundamental rights and freedoms under Section 70 – 83 of the Constitution this court as a Constitutional court must stop i
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL CASE NO 476 OF 2003 REPUBLIC ……………………….………...... APPLICANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ………….
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA DIVORCE CAUSE NO.9 “A” OF 1996 A M ………………………………………………… PLAINTIFF - versus – Y J M …………………………………………… DEFENDANT J U D G E M E N T The Petitioner A M is a Swiss national who on 31-1-92 married the Respondent a Kenyan citizen in Switzerland. Immediately after their marriage the two came to Kenya and cohabited together at Diani in South Coast of Mombasa.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA John Njoroge Warui vUniversal Bank Ltd High Court of Kenya at Nairobi August 7, 2000 Milimani Commercial Courts T Mbaluto, Judge Civil Case No 583 of 2000 This is an application for an injunction under Order 39 rule 1, 2 and 3 and to restrain the defendant from repossessing or taking possession of motor vehicle registration number KAC 031J until the suit filed by the plaintiff/applicant against the defendant/respondent is heard and determined. The application is supported by
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO. 630 OF 1996 KARL JENNING ……………….……………………………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 706 OF 1992 DIONYSIUS OMAMBIA ONYINKWA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY.............................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff herein alleged in his plaint that he was so unlawfully dismissed from his employment with the defendant that he should be awarded compensatory damages by this Court. In the course of his evidence he vehemently denied or rejected the defence’s contention that his conduct ha
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE 631 OF 1994 1. NJUGUNA ...............................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI HIGH COURT CIVIL CASE NO. 17 OF 1993 MURITHI KAGUNDU ……………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 56 OF 1989 PETER WAMBUA T/A NEW TAWA TYRE TRADING ………….….........………….. PLANTIFF VERSUS RETAIL HARDWARE & SANITARY STORES LTD & ANOTHER…………………..….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 89 OF 1989 MICAHEL MUTUA KIEMA ……….....………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS HAGGINSON MALINDI MWANGEMI GITAL CONSTRUCTION CO LTD ………….....
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 678 OF 1990 MARY WANJIRU GACHII ……………….……… APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA BUS SERVICES (MSA) LTD…………. RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 823 OF 1991 MATHIGU………...…… APPLICANT VERSUS MWAURA……..…………. DEBTOR RULING This is an application by the objector to the attachment of motor vehicle KXK 245 in execution of the decree in this suit.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Case 842 of 1988 JOHN KAMUNYU MURIGI…………..…..….....………………..PLAINTIFF - versus - PIRI MWATATA TEITEI…………...…..………...……….1ST DEFENDANT LAND REGISTRAR – KILIFI…………………....……...2ND DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 381 OF 1989 MARIAM ABDSHEIKH D/O SALIM ABDSHEIKH .…..........….PLAINTIFF VERSUS CHARLES KENNEDY WANYA FRANCIS ONSERIC ……………………………………..RESPONDENTS
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 484 OF 1989 WALTER OBARA OGOL ………………….…. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NOAH MBUGUA NJOROGE……….……RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 151 OF 1993 BACCHUS GROCERS LTD …………….……..PLAINTIFF VERSUS CRATER AUTOMOBILE (NRB) LTD …...…..DEFENDANT RULING The dispute between the parties herein relates to a contract for sale by the defendant to the plaintiff of a new Mitsubishi Fusso lorry. It is the plaintiff’s case that on the 20th February, 1993 the defendant offered to sell to him the vehicle whose details are well described by way of a vehicle order 075, and that he acc
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 368 OF 1992 HABIB BANK LIMITED..........................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MOHAMED SHARIFF HASSAN..........DEFENDANT RULING In the suit (as pleaded in the plaint) the plaintiff claims from the defendant a sum of Shs 760,322/65 alleged to be the debit balance of the amount due and owing by the defendant to the plaintiff as at 16th April, 1992. This is alleged to be in respect of the bank loan or an overdraft reflected on the defe