Judgment[2007] KEHC 1414
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…Review.…
…There is no doubt that the remedy of Judicial Review is different from an appeal because what Judicial Review deals with is the process by which the decision was arrived at but not the merits of the Board’s decision.…
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
…Review.…
…There is no doubt that the remedy of Judicial Review is different from an appeal because what Judicial Review deals with is the process by which the decision was arrived at but not the merits of the Board’s decision.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…The remedy would be with an application by way of a judicial review.…
…This although the advocate for the defendant is correct in arguing that this court has no jurisdiction to hear matters under the Physical Planning Act of 1996 the Court has a right and jurisdiction to hear judicial review…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…requirements of Order 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules in that it fails to distinguish between averments of knowledge and belief or grounds and source of the same, thirdly, that quashing the Commissioner’s action ought to be by a Judicial…
…Review application for certiorari and order for reinstatement.…
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
…RESPONDENT EX PARTE TARUS T/A TARUS & COMPANY ADVOCATES RULING The Court granted leave to the applicant to make an application for Judicial Review which he has done under this Motion.…