Judgment[1992] KEHC 14
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 30 of 1989 M Weiss Ltd v The Companies Act(Cap 486) Ruling. This is an application by way of Chamber Summons under the provisions of Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, inherent jurisdiction of the court, the Winding Up rules and all enabling provisions of law for orders that the petition be struck out on the grounds that it is in breach of 10 of the Winding Up rules and S.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISIONAL ORDER NO 1A OF 1991 SAMWEL NJUGUNA GITHINJI ........................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT ORDER IN REVISION. This is a criminal revision case under s 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 11 of 1991 In The Matter of East African Road Services Ltd and In The Matter of The Companies Act Ruling. By its petition filed in this court on 16th April, 1991, Kenya Shell Limited, a limited liability company (hereinafter called the petitioner ) seeks an order for winding up of East African Road Services Limited, a limited liability company with its registered office in Nairobi (here in after called
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
Receiver comes, he has to move the creditors to allow him to sell his properties by private treaty in order to pay and get off the hook? Well that is left to him with his counsel.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankruptcy & Winding-Up Cause 8 of 1990 Kimemia ......................................................................................... APPLICANT versus Commercial Bank of Africa Ltd ..........................................RESPONDENT RULING This is an application to set aside the receiving order given on 14/2/91 against the appellant – Debtor.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: KNELLER, HANCOX & NYARANGI JJA) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 177 OF 1984 BETWEEN KARIUKI & ANOTHER .................... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC......................................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAKURU crim app 84 of 89 MUNASIA………………………APPELLANT V REPUBLIC………………..…….RESPONDENT Judgment. The appellant pleaded guilty and convicted on his plea and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankrupcty Cause 12 of 1988 LEONARD KIMANI KEARIE……………………………………………DEBTOR RULING This is an application pursuant to the provision of S.20 of the Bankruptcy Act, Cap 53 Laws of Kenya. The applicant is the official receiver as the receiver of the estate of Leonard Kimani Kiarie, the debtor.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Winding Up Cause 1 of 1986 In the Matter of Renguti Gikambura Hotel Company Ltd and In the Matter of Companies Act (CAP.486 Laws of Kenya JUDGMENT. The Petitioner in this petition sought a winding up order.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) WINDING UP CAUSE 36 OF 1989 IN THE MATTER OF TURTLE BAY HOTELS LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT RULING. By a Petition presented on 31st August, 1989 Fitzval Remedios Santana De Souza (herein after called the Applicant) has prayed for certain reliefs under Section 211 of the Companies Act and alternatively that the Company namely Turtle Bay Hotels Limited (herein after called the Company ) be wound
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
to pay its debts and in my opinion it is just and equitable that it should be wound up. Accordingly I order that the debtor company known as Magunum International Limited be wound up.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
mind that the company is unable to pay its debts and the Petitioner is entitled to have a winding-up order as prayed in the Petition. Accordingly it is ordered that the company be wound up and the official receiver be appointed the provisional liquidator.
Division and case type: Constitutional and Human RightsPetition
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Bankruptcy Cause 1A of 1982 Mukesh Kewal Krishnan Rakham Pallan …………………………… Debtor RULING Mr M.K.K.R Pallen, the debtor, is 32 years of age. Between 1979-82 he was engaged in business on his own.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA MWAURA GATHOGO MUKONO KARANJA .................………………………………………....................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NEPATAO OLE PUNYUA................…………………………......................................