Search court decisions

…That this application be heard inter-partes on 29.8.95. 4. That the costs of this application do abide the outcome of the application.…

…The application is opposed by the defendants who have filed their own application to strike out the Applicant’s application. They gave notice of legal objections.…

…The application was heard before Omburah, SRM on 25.6.2004 and ruling delivered on 5.8.2004.…

…The application is opposed through the replying affidavit made and sworn by H I, the 2nd respondent on the ground that during the hearing of the application before the lower court the applicant did not deny that the children…

…(IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 167 OF 1996 BETWEEN CENTRAL KENYA LIMITED ......................................................…

…NO. 3590 OF 1995) ********************** RULING There being no objection to the application before me, which in fact is meritorious, I allow it as prayed.…

…It was pointed out that the application on jurisdiction was made before the Trial Court when there was a similar application pending determination before the High Court. It was stated that in the lower court, Mr.…

…Magolo indicated that they failed to disclose to this court about High Court Constitutional Petition No. 50 of 2020 but it had no bearing to the application before this court, as this application was made pursuant to the…

…substituted service through the print media and the application was xed for hearing today. 5.…

…Njoroge then made an application for adjournment on two main grounds:- 1.…

…CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 211 OF 1999 (84/99 UR) BETWEEN PETER KANYIRI KOIGI......................................APPLICANT AND 1. MAKAHU OLE SEKUNDA...............................1ST RESPONDENT 2.…

…The costs occasioned by this application shall be in the intended appeal. Given at Nairobi this 16th day of August, 1999. J.E. GICHERU ............... JUDGE OF APPEAL A.B. SHAH ............... JUDGE OF APPEL E.…

…The documents filed on behalf of the petitioner in response to the application have not shown any admission of liability on behalf of the company. Invoices alone do not prove any indebtedness.…

…In the application and affidavit, they do not show they are prepared to return the goods.…

…The application is made vide order 1XB rule 8 of Civil Procedure Rules s 3A of the CPA is 11 and s 108 of the Bankruptcy Act.…

…However no technical injection was raised to the application and the application has been argued on its merit and it is just then that I take at defect as ----------------------------------------.…

…The Petitioner in his Notice of Motion Application dated 3rd July, 2015 has sought for the following orders; a.…

…In support of the application, Mr.…

…The application has been opposed by the debtor on the ground on the ground that the application is premature.…

…I could find no provision, nor was any brought to my attention, to bring the debtors case within the exception to the application of the above section.…

…NAIROBI/BLOCK 263/1163, in Nairobi pending the hearing and determination of the Application and Petition. f. The costs of this Application be provided for. 2.…

…Whether the Petitioner/Applicant is entitled to the orders sought in the application. b. Who shall bear the costs of the application? Analysis and Determination A.…

…This is a ruling on an application for joinder by the proposed interested party filed by Notice of Motion dated 3rd October 2016. The application for joinder is not opposed by the respondents.…

…with legal capacity to sue and be sued and therefore incapable of filing such an application and consequently one which cannot participate in this constitutional petition.” 2.…

…The application is expressed to be made under r.7 (2) of the Companies Winding Up Rules and 0.44 r.1 of the Civil Procedure Rules.…

…The order can be rescinded if application made promptly and before the order is perfected.…

…This is an application by way of Chamber Summons under the provisions of Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, inherent jurisdiction of the court, the Winding Up rules and all enabling provisions of law for orders that the…

…The facts leading to this application are not seriously in dispute. The parties hereto have had business dealings.…

…The application was supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant.…

…Sigei opposed the application.…

…interval between the Service and the Interparte hearing of the application.…

…The requirement regarding the statement of the affairs of the Company is deferred until after and subject to the final order on this application.…

…It was also seen from the record that the applicant made a similar application to one before this court and that application was heard by my brother Justice Githinji on 25/4/91.…

…Yet he brought this other and similar application on the grounds that Githinji j did not hear the merits on 25/4/91 and that applicant choose to bring a fresh application rather than seek an appeal, setting aside or a review…

…Though the Application for leave under Order 53 (1) is ordinarily made ex parte, this court ordered that the same be heard interpartes.…

…to entertain the Application.…

…The company concurrently with that reply filed an application seeking orders to prohibit the company from advertising the petition and the removal of the petition from the file of the proceedings or in the alternative that…

…By 18th July 1996 when the application came before me for hearing the petition had been advertised and the petitioner had satisfied the Registrar that it had complied with the winding up Rules as it was required to do by…