Judgment[2003] KEHC 220
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…The Judicial elevation talked of here sprang from the decision of the Canadian Supreme Court in the Case of THE QUEEN V DRYBONES (1970) S.C.R. 282 where the Court interpreted Section 2 of the Bills of Rights (similar to our…
…Pylee in his Constitution of the World said; - “The US Supreme Court showed the way as to how the Constitution should be adopted to various crises of human affairs.”…
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…(a) The point is now concluded by the decision of the Supreme Court, in Manohur Lal Chopra v Seth Hira Lal (b) wherein it has been held that the Court has powers under s 151 to issue an injunction in cases not falling within…
…The Supreme Court was divided on this.…
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
…arrogate itself of jurisdiction that it does not have, Moreover, Article 165(5) (b) expressly bars this Court from hearing and determining disputes which are reserved for the Courts contemplated in Article 162(2) and the Supreme…
…Court. 6.…
Division and case type: Environment and LandMiscellaneous Application
…South Construction Company,184 Ind. 221, 110 N.E. 977 (1915), although the holding was based on proximate cause, the Indiana Supreme Court stated: “It has been laid down by law writers and the courts that the time of infancy…