Search court decisions

…The Supreme Court had occasion to consider the mandatory nature of the death sentence for the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as punishable under Section 204 of the Penal Code.…

…S. 48 {1927} the Supreme Court held: “A pardon in our days is not a private act of grace from an individual happening to possess power. It is a part of the constitutional scheme.…

…(a) The point is now concluded by the decision of the Supreme Court, in Manohur Lal Chopra v Seth Hira Lal (b) wherein it has been held that the Court has powers under s 151 to issue an injunction in cases not falling within…

…The Supreme Court was divided on this.…

…The issue of enforcement of Bill of Rights should not be a collateral question in the words of the Supreme Court in ICJ (K) v. A.G. & 2 Others S.C. Cri.…

…Appeal No. 1 of 2012 of 15th November 2012, discussing the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to deal with appeals as of right in respect to a question of interpretation of the Constitution. (6) The Petitioner's…

…arrogate itself of jurisdiction that it does not have, Moreover, Article 165(5) (b) expressly bars this Court from hearing and determining disputes which are reserved for the Courts contemplated in Article 162(2) and the Supreme…

…Court. 6.…

…South Construction Company,184 Ind. 221, 110 N.E. 977 (1915), although the holding was based on proximate cause, the Indiana Supreme Court stated: “It has been laid down by law writers and the courts that the time of infancy…