Search court decisions

…The suit is time barred having been brought outside the statutory limitation in view of Sections 4(2) and 32 of the Limitation of Actions Act, 2012. 2.…

…In the Limitation of Actions Act and within the provisions of section 4 it provides that; “4.…

…That the suit is statute-barred under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act; b.   That the Defendants are wrongly sued; and c.   …

…(ii) Limitation of Actions and Fraud 17.   Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act prescribes a twelve-year limitation period for actions to recover land.…

…Quoting the pleadings in paragraphs 15 and 16 of the plaint, Counsel submitted that the suit was statutorily time-barred under sections 7 and 9(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act because L.R. NO.…

…That section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act forbids any actions to recover land against the Defendants after 12 years from the date the cause of action first accrued to the deceased.…

…the Limitation of Actions Act, Chapter 22 Laws of Kenya.…

…the Limitation of Actions Act and urged the court to find that the plea of limitation of actions is without basis.…

…Further reliance was placed on the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act, to anchor the proposition that the Plaintiff’s claim against the 1st Defendant is time-barred.…

…Plaintiff to dispense with the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act.…

…Section 4 (1) of the Limitation of Actions Act provides that no action shall be brought after 6 years from the date the cause of action accrued. v.…

…the Limitation of Actions Act.…

…The Court has carefully gone through the present PO and notes that it is premised on the provisions of Section 4 (1)(a) and 26 of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22. 15.   …

…the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22 or not.…

…Under Section 7 of the Limitations of Actions Act, the plaintiff's family had 12 years to file a suit to recover the loss.…

…According to the respondent, the time started to run for the limitation of actions from June 2021. Hence, the court has jurisdiction to handle this matter. 15.…

…Further, that Article 159 cannot override the Limitations of Actions Act as it is not a panacea for non-compliance with statutory provisions. 9.…

…Further, that section 23 (3) of the Limitation of Actions Act provides that where there is an acknowledgement, the cause of action arises on this date.…

…Both defendants denied negligence but the second defendant also pleaded the Limitation of Actions Act (cap 22).…

…The position with regard to the effect of the Limitation of Actions Act where a party is added is now so well established that it requires little comment.…

…While conceding that Section 4(1)(a) of the Limitation of Actions Act ordinarily bars contractual claims after six years, they invoke Sections 23(3) and 24(1) of Limitation of Actions Act , which provide that a written and…

…The 1 st -4 th Defendants have raised a preliminary objection on the ground that the suit is time barred by dint of Section 4 (1) (a) of the Limitation of Actions Act and Section 3(2) Public Authorities Limitations of Action…

…CR 27920 sub-division No. 176 which is registered in the name of the Defendant is time barred under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act and that they had acquired their portions of the land by way of prescription;…

…The Plaintiffs aver that in any event the Limitation of Actions Act give a Limitation period of 12 years in any action to recover land by the defendant .....; and 17.…

…A Bill of Costs is not an 'Action' to which section 4 of the Limitation of Actions could have applied.…

…An objection on the ground that a matter is caught up by the law of limitation of actions is a pure point of law as was held by Law JA in the case of Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co.…

…A Bill of Costs is not an 'Action' to which section 4 of the Limitation of Actions could have applied.…

…An objection on the ground that a matter is caught up by the law of limitation of actions is a pure point of law as was held by Law JA in the case of Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co.…

…A Bill of Costs is not an 'Action' to which section 4 of the Limitation of Actions could have applied.…

…An objection on the ground that a matter is caught up by the law of limitation of actions is a pure point of law as was held by Law JA in the case of Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co.…

…of Actions Act (Cap 22).…

…In this case, the defendants pleaded that the plaintiff’s action for recovery of the suit property was statute barred under Section 7 of Limitation of Actions Act.…

…It would appear that the respondent raised an objection to the bill on the ground that the applicant’s claim for professional fees was time barred under the Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22). 2.…

…The applicant pleaded that a bill of costs filed under Section 51(1) of the Advocates Act was not a suit or action to which the Limitation of Actions Act applied and that the taxing officer had erred in law in failing to…

…A Bill of Costs is not an 'Action' to which section 4 of the Limitation of Actions could have applied.…

…An objection on the ground that a matter is caught up by the law of limitation of actions is a pure point of law as was held by Law JA in the case of Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd (1969…

…A Bill of Costs is not an 'Action' to which section 4 of the Limitation of Actions could have applied.…

…An objection on the ground that a matter is caught up by the law of limitation of actions is a pure point of law as was held by Law JA in the case of Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co.…