Judgment[1996] KEHC 28
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
so that if the court subsequently adopts that award it may be difficult to execute the resultant order especially at the Land Registry. Learned counsels in this matter do not seem to see all these.Counsel for the applicant is only complaining at the Arbitrator’s misconduct.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 120 OF 1996 KIATHI TRADING CO.
Division and case type: CIVIL DIVISIONCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO 2959 OF 1996 Hassan & 4 others v Kenya Wildlife Service Injunction – temporary injunction – principles that guide the court in granting an injunction – grant of injunction against removal of a rare and endangered species from its natural habitat - preservation of wild animals in their natural habitat. Wildlife – statutory powers of Kenya Wildlife Service – Wildlife (Conservation & Management) Act (cap 386) s
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NUMBER 101 OF 1996 FULCHAND MANEK & BROTHERS…………………………..………PLAINTIFF VERSUS BULLION BANK LIMITED……………………………………………….DEFENDANT RULING There being no denial by the Defendant/Respondent that the cheques on which the applicant’s account was debited did not belong to the plaintiff/applicant as deposed in paragraphs 5 – 9 of the affidavit in support of the application for summary judgment, I am of the view that the defence filed a hall
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Civil Appeal 64 of 1995 CHAIRMAN & SECRETARY TABLIGH FLYSABULLAHI MARKAZ SELF HELP GROUP..APPELLANTS VERSUS DAVID MOTUKU NZAU …………….................................................................……...…..…… RESPONDENT Corum: J. Nzei Advocate for Appellant/Applicant Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 2213 OF 1991 DEVA SAMAT KESHWALA & 10 OTHERS.....................APPLICANTS VERSUS TOLK INVESTMENTS (K) LTD..........................................DEFENDANT UNITED NATIONS FOOD PROGRAMME...........................DEFENDANT RULING On the 15.12.92 I dismissed the application filed by the second defendant on 10.2.92. That application sought an order that the name of the second defendant be struck out and the suit against the
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1676 OF 1995 ROSEMARY WANJIKU KINYANJUI …………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS MARTIN WAINAINA KINYAJUI……….....….RESPONDENT RULING OF THE COURT Before the 24th October, 1995, I had considered the application before me and said as follows: “The parties herein have been in matrimony for thirty one years. They have materially prospered together and can without embellishment be said to be quite rich.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 706 OF 1992 DIONYSIUS OMAMBIA ONYINKWA...................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY.............................DEFENDANT RULING The plaintiff herein alleged in his plaint that he was so unlawfully dismissed from his employment with the defendant that he should be awarded compensatory damages by this Court. In the course of his evidence he vehemently denied or rejected the defence’s contention that his conduct ha
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
The respondents swear that they were prepared to accept the applicants papers if they were in order despite the order from the Chief Magistrate, Nakuru if the same were presented within the prescribed time. No attempt was made to present the papers within the prescribed time.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 3723 of 1990 HELLEN MUHONJA MAINA................................................. PLAINTIFF VERSUS PETER KINAGI GITUKA..................................................
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Gicheru, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE 631 OF 1994 1. NJUGUNA ...............................................
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO 361 OF 1994 SIMEL & OTHERS.........................................................................APPLICANTS VERSUS COUNTY COUNCIL OF NAROK & OTHERS...........................RESPONDENTS RULING The applicants have applied for leave to apply for judicial review to quash the decisions of the County Council of Narok affecting the applicants’ right to prohibit similar decisions being taken by it and to prohibi
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI HIGH COURT CIVIL CASE NO. 17 OF 1993 MURITHI KAGUNDU ……………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI HIGH COURT CIVIL CASE NO. 17 OF 1993 MURITHI KAGUNDU ……………………………………….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1946 OF 1983 CREDIT CORPORATION LTD....................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS MATHEW JOSEPH OGUTU................................................................RESPONDENT RULING By her application dated 19th January, 1994 the second defendant applies for three orders namely that execution of decree herein against her be stayed, that ex parte judgment entered against her on 28th M
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 56 OF 1989 PETER WAMBUA T/A NEW TAWA TYRE TRADING ………….….........………….. PLANTIFF VERSUS RETAIL HARDWARE & SANITARY STORES LTD & ANOTHER…………………..….
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU CIVIL CASE NO 390 OF 1992(OS) KIBUNDI …………….…………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS MUKOBWA & ANOTHER ….….... DEFENDANT RULING This is a preliminary question as to whether, by reason of the determination of the originating summons by the High Court, in the High Court Civil Case No 2411 of 1979 (OS), at Nairobi, the instant originating summons, which was also started at Nairobi but in due course was transferred here, is barred by the application of the doctrine of
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 89 OF 1989 MICAHEL MUTUA KIEMA ……….....………….… PLAINTIFF VERSUS HAGGINSON MALINDI MWANGEMI GITAL CONSTRUCTION CO LTD ………….....
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL CASE NO 678 OF 1990 MARY WANJIRU GACHII ……………….……… APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA BUS SERVICES (MSA) LTD…………. RESPONDENT RULING This is an application for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal.