Judgment[1986] KEHC 23
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 3586 of 1985 LOCHAB TRANSPORT LTD .........................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA ARAB ORIENT INSURANCE LTD...............................................DEFEDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO,S1288 & 1239 of 1984 1.L.L 2.P.M.........................................................................PLAINTIFFS VERSUS 1.JARED.A.AYUKU 2.KIPLANGAT ARAP CHEPKUL........................DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1252 OF 1985 MBUTHIA........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION.................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL CASE NO. 74 OF 1983 PAOLO BENCIVENGA......................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS GILBERT AMIMO..........................................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 2260 OF 1982 NEWSTANLEY HOTEL LIMITED ...................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS ARCADE TOBACCONISTS LIMITED..........................................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL, AT KISUMU CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 116 OF 1985 Madhupaper International Limited versus Kerr (application from the High Court at Nairobi, O’Connor J, Civil Suit 3438 of 1985) December 16, 1985, Kneller, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA delivered the following Order of the Court. Madhupaper International Limited, the company, manufacturers cartons, tissues and lavatory paper in the industrial area of Nairobi.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Republic of Kenya High Court, at Mombasa Civil Cases Nos 325 & 326 of 1978 Roba v Jarso Cases No cases referred to. Statutes Government Proceedings Act, (cap 40) section 12 October 28, 1985, Bhandari J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT KISUMU (Coram: Hancox, Nyarangi JJA & Gachuhi Ag JA CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 41 OF 1985 Between BATHOLOMEW MUYALE .............................APPLICANT AND SHEM NYAMBASI MULEFU ...........................DEFENDANT ELIJA NANDI CHIKAMAI................................DEFENDANT (In an intended appeal from an order of the High Court at Kakamega, Aganyanya J in Civil Suit No 13 of 1979) *************************
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Attorney General v Saeed High Court, at Mombasa July 29, 1985 Aragon J Civil Case No 584 of 1977 July 29, 1985, Aragon J delivered the following Ruling. This is an application by Messrs A Y A Jiwaji & Jiwaji who are now acting for the defendant for dismissal of this suit for want of prosecution.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 772 OF 1984 AURORA BAKING COMPANY (1975) LTD………………PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT AND PHENNTHA WANINGI AND 3 OTHERS………….DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS RULING By an order of this court dated 19.11.84 the hearing of the plaintiff’s/applicant’s application filed in this court on 13.11.84 was stood over to 8.1.85 before the Duty Judge and the caveat lodged in respect of L R No.10445/3 situated in Nyandarua District was extended pending the disposa
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
Esso Standard Kenya Ltd v Onesmus Kihara Mwangi Court of Appeal, at Nairobi June 5, 1985 Hancox JA, Platt & Gachuhi Ag JJA Civil Application No NAI 29 of 1984 (Application from the High Court at Nairobi, Nyarangi J) Appeal – delay in filing–– letter to Registrar requesting for precedings not copied to respondent – Rule 81 (2) Court of Appeal Rules. Nyarangi J as he then was on July 18, 1980 gave judgment in favour of the Esso Standard Kenya (no plaintiff) the defendant filed notice of appeal o
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Obilo v Angila High Court, at Kisii May 14, 1985 Masime J Civil Case No 51 of 1985 May 14, 1985, Masime J delivered the following Ruling. This is an application by way of chamber summons for an order to restrain the second respondent South Nyanza Company Limited from realizing the proceeds of some 56.77 tones of sugar cane delivered by the 1st respondent Silvanus Omolo Angila out of land title number Kamagambo/Kanyawanga/164; there is also a prayer for an order for the costs
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Obilo v Angila High Court, at Kisii May 14, 1985 Masime J Civil Case No 51 of 1985 May 14, 1985, Masime J delivered the following Ruling. This is an application by way of chamber summons for an order to restrain the second respondent South Nyanza Company Limited from realizing the proceeds of some 56.77 tones of sugar cane delivered by the 1st respondent Silvanus Omolo Angila out of land title number Kamagambo/Kanyawanga/164; there is also a prayer for an order for the costs
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Kenya Commercial Bank v Nyahururu Blocks & Iron Mongers High Court, at Nairobi April 15, 1985 Masime J Civil Case No 376 of 1978 April 15, 1985, Masime J delivered the following Ruling. On October 2, 1984 the decree-holders advocates by letter to the deputy registrar requested that this case be mentioned to consider the position of the execution ordered.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Grinyamwaya v Nairobi City Commission High Court, at Nairobi March 28, 1985 Gachuhi J Civil Case No 1805 of 1984 Cases Obongo & Another vs Municipal Council of Kisumu [1971] EA p 91 at page 96 letter B Rookes v Barnard and others (1964) AC 1129 Kampala City Council v Nakaye [1972] E A 446 at page 448 Matthew Thimbara vs Athumani Singa and another H C C C 2141/82 (unreported) Statutes March 28, 1985, Gachuhi J delivered the following Judgment. The plaintiff a retired employee of the City Council
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Ngeyma v Akamba Public Service High Court, at Mombasa February 8, 1985 Mandari J Civil Case No 1034 of 1983 Cases Benham Carter v Hyde Park Hotel Ltd [1948] 64 TLR 177 Firozali Noormchmed Haji v Elias Kapomba Toka C A 46/80 (unreported) Reckless V P C Allday & Co Ltd & another, 9 – 018. Advocates Anjarwalla for plaintiff Juma for defendants February 8, 1985, Mandari J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Ngeyma v Akamba Public Service High Court, at Mombasa February 8, 1985 Mandari J Civil Case No 1034 of 1983 Cases Benham Carter v Hyde Park Hotel Ltd [1948] 64 TLR 177 Firozali Noormchmed Haji v Elias Kapomba Toka C A 46/80 (unreported) Reckless V P C Allday & Co Ltd & another, 9 – 018. Advocates Anjarwalla for plaintiff Juma for defendants February 8, 1985, Mandari J delivered the following Judgment.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Olesa (an infant) v Bayete Peugeot Services Limited High Court, at Nairobi January 30, 1985 O’Kubasu J Civil Case No 297 of 1984 Cases 1. Jones v Giffiths [1969] 2 ALL ER 1015 2.
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram:Kneller JA) CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 33 OF 1984 BETWEEN GEOFFREY NDUNG’U THEURI ……………APPLICANT AND LAW SOCIETY OF KENYA…………………..RESPONDENT (In an intended appeal from the High Court at Nairobi, Porter J) RULING Geoffrey Ndung’u Theuri, the applicant, by an ex parte motion on notice filed by July 31, 1984 under rule 112 of the Court of Appeal Rules (cap 9), moves that the court by orders directs that his intended appeal may be lodged without prior payment
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
advocates for all the parties had agreed on the quotum of damages and hence the following consent order was recorded by this court. “By consent judgment for the plaintiff against all the defendants jointly and severally in the inclusive sum of shs 2,153,500 inclusive of costs with court disbursements to be paid by the defendants.