Judgment[1988] KEHC 51
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 3288 OF 1987 BERNARD WAMAREMA KAIRU..............................APPELLANT VERSUS LION OF KENYA INSURANCE CO LTD..................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 590 OF 1988 ALPHONCE ANDALO & ANOTHER t/a Highspeed General Supplies ……………………. APPLICANT VERSUS JAMES GLEEN RUSSEL LTD………......................…...RESPONDENT RULING The Notice of Motion application which came for hearing was filed in court on 23rd March 1988.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
The application dated 9th July 1987, is brought by the plaintiffs under order XXXIX rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The plaintiff seeks for orders that an order for injunction be granted restraining the registration of the transfer of parcel number LR 209/407/ 10 Kirichwa Lane Nairobi to the third defendant or any other person until the final disposal of this suit that the sale of the said property by the first defendant to the third defendan
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISC. 298 OF 1986 REPUBLIC OF KENYA.........................................APPLICANT VERSUS THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS............................RESPONDENT EX-PARTE - KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS AND BANKING, INSURANCE AND FINANCE UNION (K) .....INTERESTED PARTY CORAM: GICHERU, J.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYAAT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE No. 1271 OF 1979 SYAN..................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS SUNSET HOTEL LTD...................................RESPONDENT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT, AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 3642 OF 1987 ENOCK OWITI OKANJA……………………………………..PLAINTIFF VERSUS BILLY ONYANGO……………………………….……..1ST DEFENDANT MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH, NAIROBI….......….2ND DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO 2637 OF 1987 PIONEER GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LTD………………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS D W KARANJA…………………………………………………….DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 3490 OF 1987 M A……………………………………..…………………PLAINTIFF VERSUS HILTON INTERNATIONAL (K) LTD …........….….1ST DEFENDANT M A……………………………………..….…..….2ND DEFENDANT RULING Mrs M A, the plaintiff in this case, is a very angry woman.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL CASE NO 2864 OF 1987 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED …………. PLAINTIFF VERSUS BOBMIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED & FLOW METERS & ALLIED HARDWARE LIMITED…………...............…… DEFENDANT RULING The motion before the court is based upon the Affidavit of JAO Adera Chief Legal/corporation Secretary of the plaintiff Bank.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
reliefs she sought in this Originating Summons. I hereby therefore dismiss her suit with costs.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1495 OF 1982 CHINGA TEA FACTORY COMPANY LTD….....…………….PLAINTIFF VERSUS MIUGU GENERAL TRANSPORT CO LTD………………DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 1967 OF 1982 ABUBAKAR SIMBA …………..……………………..
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CASE NO 1333 ‘B’ OF 1982 WAITHERERO……………………….………PLAINTIFF V KIMUNYE INVESTMENTS…......…………..DEFENDANT RULING The defendant herein Kimunye Investments Ltd, moved the court under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) asking for orders that:- “The sale of motor-vehicle Reg No KTJ 996, in August 1986 or thereabouts be set aside for being illegal and or fraudulent and unjust.” The application was supported b
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
Umoja Enterprises Limited pending the hearing and final disposal of this suit. In making the above order the court must consider that the injunction might or could operate oppressively to the defendants especially as amended.
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO 1414 OF 1980 JUMA KHAMISI KARIUKI ….…..………………………………..….………PLAINTIFF versus EAST AFRICA INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND GEORGE OKOKO ….….DEFENDANTS
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: CivilCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.3923 OF 1985 KIGIKA DEVELOPERS LIMITED.........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS NAIROBI CITY COMMISSION...........................................................DEFENDANT RULING This matter originally came before me on an application to strike out the defence. I struck out the defence but as the action was somewhat unusual I refused to give judgment, but directed that the case be set down for
Division and case type: CivilMiscellaneous Application
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL MISC APPL 136 OF 1986 JOSHUA CHEGE WANYOIKE ……………………………………….….. APPLICANT AND JAMES THIGA MUKURO …………………………..……...…………… RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to serve the record of appeal and the appeal be admitted of time at the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru ( Masime J ) dated December 3, 1983 In High Court Civil Case No 235 of 1982 RULING The applicant was duly served with the notice for the hearing of the application but did not atten
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE 3452 OF 1984 JOSEPH MUTUNGA WAMBUA............................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS KANTILAL KHIMJI PATEL & ANOTHER..........................DEFENDANT
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsCivil Case
The application which is expressed to be brought under order 94 rule 10 and 11, order XXI rule 22, order XII rule 1 and order XXII rule 11(1) and (2) Civil Procedure Rules was filed on 27th, two days before the date fixed for the sale of goods attached in the suit to recover the amount of the decree. The goods include, an air compressor, two sand blasting units, three air spray guns, three tool kits and some spare parts.