Judgment[2014] KEIC 9
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
Moses Kiprotich Rutto & Others v Telkom Kenya Limited (Cause 139 (N) of 2009) [2014] KEIC 9 (KLR) (Employment and Labour) (22 December 2014) (Ruling) Moses Kiprotich Rutto & Others v Telkom Kenya Limited [2014] eKLR Neutral citation: [2014] KEIC 9 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT AT NAIROBI EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR CAUSE 139 (N) OF 2009 NZIOKI WA MAKAU, J DECEMBER 22, 2014 REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT AT NAIROBI EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR CAUSE 139 (N) OF 2009 NZIOKI WA MAKAU
Division and case type: Milimani Commercial CourtsUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS) Misc Appli 1670 of 2007 ABID ALI HASHIM……...………..……………….APPLICANT VERSUS ANTONY KIHONGE MUHIA …..……………RESPONDENT RULING Before me is a notice of motion filed pursuant to Section 18 (1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant seek an order of the court to transfer Nairobi CMCCC No.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 89 OF 2003 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT 2001 SECTION 162 BABY DK (AN INFANT) RULING This is an application for international adoption.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 4 OF 2002 A.W.H ……………………….
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA NIMA INVESTMENTS LIMITED ..............................APPLICANT AND STEPHEN MBUKI KIMANI ..................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G Having heard advocates for both parties and in all the circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that this is a proper case to exercise my discretion and grant the extension sought. Accordingly, I order that Notice of Appeal be filed within 7 days from today and the Record of Appeal within 21 days thereafter.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: (GICHERU, OMOLO & SHAH JJ.A) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI249 OF 2000 (117/2000 UR) BETWEEN Hurlingham Hospital Management Ltd ....................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, KWACH & TUNOI, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 260 OF 1999 BETWEEN JOEL MUTHUI KYAMBU .................................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURTSOF APPEAL AT NAIROBI civil misc appl 211 of 98 MACHARIA KARUGU I ......................................APPLICANT AND CHEGE MACHARIA .........................................RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time to file Notice and Record of Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Githinji) dated 13th October, 1997 in H.C.C.C. 379 OF 1986) ************* R U L I N G This is an application under rule 4 of the Rules of this Court
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Omolo, Shah & Owuor, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 1999 (89/99UR) BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.....................................................APPLICANT AND DABER ENTERPRISES LIMITED...................................................................RESPONDENT (An application for a stay of execution pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (GICHERU, TUNOI & LAKHA, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 87 1999 (32/99 UR) BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC .......................................
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: LAKHA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
(An application for stay of execution of the order and decree pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Hon. Rimita) dated 17th March, 1999 in H.C.C.C.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
(An application for stay of execution of the order and decree pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the ruling and order of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Hon. Rimita) dated 17th March, 1999 in H.C.C.C.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA COME TO AFRICA SAFARIS LIMITED............................................................... APPELLANT AND BARCLAYS BANK OF KENYA LIMITED..........................................................RESPONDENT (An Appeal from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO J.A (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.NAI. 214 OF 1998 BETWEEN NATIONAL CEREALS & PRODUCE BOARD.......................APPLICANT AND ALBERT ONGARO..........................................RESPONDENT R U L I N G I have read the notice of motion and the affidavit in support thereof.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Tunoi, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & OWUOR JJ.A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 118/98) BETWEEN NYANJA HOLDINGS LIMITED GEORGE NJAU MBUGUA NYANJA MRS.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
The applicants bail is reinstated on similar terms as granted earlier. Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 3rd day of June, 1998 J.L.A.
Division and case type: GeneralUnclassified
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI civ app 249 of 97 ZEBRON NGUKU MOTE...................................APPELLANT V EPHANTUS MOTE WAKARIA.................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT This is a second appeal and concerns land. A portion of the suit land was being cultivated by the appellant, who is the son of the respondent.