Judgment[2000] KEHC 201
BENROSE FAST FOOD v MURANGA PROPERTIES LTD
High Court at Nairobi
Case law
Search tips: "exact phrase" · -exclude · land | property · negligen* · citations like [2023] KEHC 123
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 1424 OF 1997 BENROSE FAST FOOD………...……..…………………………………..PLAINTIFF -VERSUSMURANGA PROPERTIES LTD……....….…………………………..DEFENDANT RULING In this application which is by Chamber Summons the applicant is asking for the Orders prayed in the application.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL SUIT NO. 3257 OF 1978 ERIC PETER WANJAU .................................................PLAINTIFF AND GEORGE MUNDET ....................................................DEFENDANT R U L I N G On 26th of March, 1993 this court entered a judgment pursuant to an Award filed and read in court on 2nd December, 1992, in the presence of Mr.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL SUIT 1293 OF 93 BARNABAS EMBUKHANE & 9 OTHERS.…………PLAINTIFF -VERSUSGENERAL PLASTICS LIMITED.…………………….DEFENDANT
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU Civil Suit 447 of 1996 HILLARY MUNUHE GACHINGA......................................... PLAINTIFF VERSUS NORWEGIAN PEOPLE'S AID..................................
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (Coram: Omolo, Shah & Owuor, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 223 OF 1999 (89/99UR) BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.....................................................APPLICANT AND DABER ENTERPRISES LIMITED...................................................................RESPONDENT (An application for a stay of execution pending the lodging and hearing of an intended appeal from the Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL SUIT NO. 1267 OF 1999 DISHON GOGO & 6 OTHERS .............................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BRIGADIER JOHN SEREM & 10 OTHERS ...................DEFENDANTS R U L I N G Before this Court is Amended Chamber Summons brought under Order XXI Rule 22.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS CIVIL SUIT NO. 2234 OF 1993 IDRIS KIBIRANGA ........................................................
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
Co-Operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Shiraz Shabudin Sayani t/a Makupa AGIP Service Station (Civil Suit 23 of 1999) [1999] KEHC 170 (KLR) (19 April 1999) (Ruling) Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd v Shiraz Shabudin Sayani t/a Makupa Agip Service Station [1999] eKLR Neutral citation: [1999] KEHC 170 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT 23 OF 1999 PN WAKI, J APRIL 19, 1999 BETWEEN CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LTD .............................................. PLAINTIFF AND SHIRAZ
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET Civil Suit 40 of 1998 MAECEOM CONSULTANTS...........................................................................PLAINTIFF versus KERIO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.....................................DEFENDANT RULING The defendants herein who are Messrs Kerio Valley Development Authority vide their letter ref KVDA/HQS/PRJ/630/VOL.XVI dated 6/3/97 wrote to the plaintiff Maeceom Consultants. The subject of the letter was valuation of T
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 224 OF 1997 BETWEEN 1.
Division and case type: Environment and LandLand Case
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, AKIWUMI & PALL, JJ.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 284 OF 1997 (UR.120/97) BETWEEN EZRA ODONDI OPAR ........................................APPLICANT AND TOTAL KENYA LIMITED ....................................RESPONDENT (Application for an order of a temporary injunction to restrain the Respondent from retaking possession of the Kendu Bay Total Service Station the subject matter of the Applicant's intended Appeal and to Restrain the R
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Suit 249 of 1995 KHIMJI'S SECONDHAND MART....................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS TABURA SECURITY AGENCY (K).............................DEFENDANT J U D G M E N T On the 3rd of April, 1995 a plaint was filed in the MombasaHigh Court of Kenya District Registry. The Plaintiff wasdescribed as Kimji's Secondhand Mart - a business firm trading atMombasa.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO 853 OF 1995 M M …………………........……PLAINTIFF VERSUS D C J ……………………..1ST DEFENDANT V N K ……………………2ND DEFENDANT RULING M M, the Plaintiff herein, seeks an interlocutory injunction to restrain D C J, the 1st Defendant, from contracting a marriage under Marriage Act (Cap. 150) of the Africa Christian Marriage and Divorce Act (Cap.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CIVIL SUIT NO 235 OF 1995 KENINDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ……PLAINTIFF VERSUS BHAI O M AL-AMIN………………..…………..DEFENDANT RULING The Defendant seeks to set aside an ex-parte judgement entered against him in default of appearance. He does not deny that he was served with summons to enter appearance but failed to do so.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
rule 5, make provision for the same remedy he did not think there was any conflict. The two orders merely provide different grounds for the remedy, he said.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
It does not appear to me that they stand to suffer any substantial loss if the orders sought in this application are not granted. I specifically dealt with this matter in my ruling.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
would have been done on October 24, 1990 a day after the hearing and making of garnishee order absolute. That notification would have served no purpose on that date for no fault of the Garnishee who was not served as provided by Rule 1 (2) of the said order.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CIVIL SUIT NO. 23 OF 1992 D.M.AMAYAMU..............................................................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS BENJAMIN K.
Division and case type: CivilCivil Suit
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA Civil Suit 299 of 1990 SILAS MIHESO ...................................................................................PLAINTIFF - Versus - MODERN BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED...........DEFENDANT J U D G M E NT In 1984 the plaintiff was employed by the Furniture CentreLtd. But in May he entered into negotiations withthe defendant's managing director..